Snake back to training tomorrow???

Hi Guys

Need to eat humble pie, just been contacted by my source after reading my post and been advised Matai settlement organised but most likely the salary cap dispensation will not be allowed as the injury is considered "pre existing"? Therefore we will most likely need to cover under our salary cap this year. Manly supposably arguing case.

But Snake and management have NOT agreed to payout yet, with a recent offer rejected. We had jumped the gun. Evidently there may be some hostility between parties and will not be resolved anytime soon.

Correctly, I was put in my place, my apologies. I was a little too keen on sharing the info.
I hope that your source is not Zorba! He would hate you for eating his humble pie

The eels received salary cap dispensation for Watmough and his injury was pre existing. The NRL's favouritism is astounding
 
I hope that your source is not Zorba! He would hate you for eating his humble pie

The eels received salary cap dispensation for Watmough and his injury was pre existing. The NRL's favouritism is astounding

That's what made me laugh when I read that there is not likely to be any dispensation. Every man and his dog knew full well that Choc had a history of knee problems since about 2010.
 
Last edited:
But Snake and management have NOT agreed to payout yet, with a recent offer rejected. We had jumped the gun. Evidently there may be some hostility between parties and will not be resolved anytime soon.
I just don't understand this. The club gave him the extension - at the time I thought thy were crazy because he had been injured and there was zero pressure to extend - so they have to pay him. If he's too injured to play they still have to pay him. As it should be. He absolutely should hold out for the full contract.
What am I missing?
 
I just don't understand this. The club gave him the extension - at the time I thought thy were crazy because he had been injured and there was zero pressure to extend - so they have to pay him. If he's too injured to play they still have to pay him. As it should be. He absolutely should hold out for the full contract.
What am I missing?
The person who agreed to the extension is missing - Joe Kelly.
 
I just don't understand this. The club gave him the extension - at the time I thought thy were crazy because he had been injured and there was zero pressure to extend - so they have to pay him. If he's too injured to play they still have to pay him. As it should be. He absolutely should hold out for the full contract.
What am I missing?
I would say that Matai's injury prevents him from playing whatsoever, or perhaps 75-25, whereas Stewart could still play if the club didn't want to pay him out, at what ability, who knows?, so perhaps he's on a contract of around $700,000 and the club only offered $400,000, and Brett wants a full payout.
 
Fair rant.

Most of it is utter crap, but fair rant.
thank you doctor phil, i sometimes need to vent the uncertainty of our backline has me a little edgy. Yes no doubt i fabricated most of my rant but i would get job at telegraph.
Dce in all seriousness needs to take the ball to the line to be talked about in JT land, the ability is there. thats the one thing Foreskin did well we need him to take line on both with pass and run that said the hooker need to pass the ball to his chest and not his ankles.
 
January 15th. Still no Snake and Matai...

IMG_0527.JPG
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Back
Top Bottom