All we are saying, is Pearce off !

The modern age of the internet is about decreased censorship and greater freedom of expression (regardless of whether you approve of the manner)

Man up, so what if someone calls you a c***sucker? Are you that f***ing pathetic that you can't handle that some joe on the other side of the world is calling you names?

I'm not sure I agree with you on that mate.

I see the internet as more of platform by which people abuse their anonymous persona to say things and behave in a manor of which they wouldn't do in public; for the fear of being put on their arse in most circumstances.

But hey if you want to call faceless tirades of abuse "freedom of expression" then you go for it. But i doubt you'd be even remotely the same should you be caught out and about with the wife and kids.

More of a cowards-board than anything?
 
Obviously you missed reading the Terms of Service and Rules when you signed up to Silvertails so here they are again just for you.

Terms of Service and Rules

The providers ("we", "us", "our") of the service provided by this web site ("Service") are not responsible for any user-generated content and accounts ("Content"). Content submitted express the views of their author only.

You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws.

All Content you submit or upload may be reviewed by staff members. All Content you submit or upload may be sent to third-party verification services (including, but not limited to, spam prevention services). Do not submit any Content that you consider to be private or confidential.

We reserve the rights to remove or modify any Content submitted for any reason without explanation. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. We reserve the right to take action against any account with the Service at any time.

You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content.

These terms may be changed at any time without notice.

If you do not agree with these terms, please do not register or use this Service. If you wish to close your account, please contact us.

https://silvertails.net/help/terms


The way you have been going about your posting content since you arrived on Silvertails, you have violated several of the conditions. Consider this a warning to follow the terms and conditions that you were supposed to have agreed to or you just might find yourself on either a temporary or if worse comes to worse, a permanent holiday from Silvertails.
Look, strictly speaking 95% of members have violated the terms and conditions as they are so broadly worded and extremely subjective in interpretation and enforcement. The problem for moderators is to try to be as objective as possible when dealing with objectionable disputes between various members. In such a pc environment everything is offensive.
 
  • Clever
Reactions: R3
Look, strictly speaking 95% of members have violated the terms and conditions as they are so broadly worded and extremely subjective in interpretation and enforcement. The problem for moderators is to try to be as objective as possible when dealing with objectionable disputes between various members. In such a pc environment everything is offensive.

I find that what your saying has offended me! I am going to ring my solicitor! after he's been released.
 
Are we entering a dating site now Woodsie? Very pretty but I bet she would take you for everything if you invited her home to meet mama

Mea non culpa ... it's that @Ryan that says he can rodger Shins

PS .. I am not on any dating site ... any woman that looked at a photo of me and thought ... "wow, I'd like a piece of that" obviously has too many issues requiring mental health intervention for me.
 
Look, strictly speaking 95% of members have violated the terms and conditions as they are so broadly worded and extremely subjective in interpretation and enforcement. The problem for moderators is to try to be as objective as possible when dealing with objectionable disputes between various members. In such a pc environment everything is offensive.


I take umbrage to that comment Spartan. I have never violated the terms and conditions of this site...unless I thought I had to.
 
i try not to breach the rules, but sometimes a certain posters makes such an outrageously stupid and offensive statement, that i cant help myself, and its worth the risk of a holiday to show my displeasure, for the better of this fine community of committed supporters.
 
It's hard to believe looking at the squad and their actual values that we are close to the cap.....................unless we are paying massive overs on a lot of players.

Anyone know if there is any accurate information out there on each players contract?

yes. There is no accurate contract information out there at all.
 
I've read various reports that Snake/Matai were being paid somewhere between $1.3--1.7-Million. Now, just say you gave the Turbos pay increases of $400,000 each - which is substantial on top of their existing contracts - then that still leaves a heap of money over. Plus there is an NRL increase in the cap which should easily take care of payment upgrades to other players - notably Api, Uate, Frankenstein, Sirro and some Under 20s - plus our two modest purchases, Jack Rabbit and The Croak.
I don't understand why we'd still be paying for Myles.
So, I am mystified why we don't have $800,000 or so space in the cap. It is particularly galling when it seems clubs such as the Donkeys, Easts and Cronulla can buy anyone.

Turbos pay increase were more than that, close to $2M combined now.

Also have heard that players these days have clauses that if the cap rises they get a chunk of it (essentially paid a % of cap rather than an amount) which would mean a cap rise means nothing to the club.
 
Turbos pay increase were more than that, close to $2M combined now.
Wow. If true we now have three players taking up $3-M of our cap (around 33%), with the other 27 players having to 'make do' with the remaining 66%. Sounds like we are following the Melbourne Storm formula, and who's to argue with their success.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
1 1 0 36 2
1 1 0 30 2
1 1 0 22 2
1 1 0 8 2
1 1 0 6 2
1 1 0 2 2
1 1 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -6 0
1 0 1 -8 0
1 0 1 -22 0
1 0 1 -30 0
1 0 1 -36 0
Back
Top Bottom