Hopefully the dogs offer a mill a year...because then Parra will offer something like 1.5 a year. And then lol @ parra
Never seen a front rower reverse into the defence as much as himHe's a myth
Interesting.Woods averaging 17 runs per game to Jakes 9.5
Woods averaging 164.25m per game to Jakes 93
Jakes 9.78m per run to Woods 9.66
Jakes 40 tackles a game to Woods 27
They both make 1.5 offloads a game
I can remember a prop we had that backed into the defence just as much as woods does... He won the clive churchill medal in the grand final with the biggest winning margin of all time if i remember correctlyNever seen a front rower reverse into the defence as much as him
Jake, at this stage is not worth one million, Taumolo, yes, probably along with Bromwich.Not for a Million a year.
The only 2 forwards I would pay 1m a season for are Jake turbo and Jason taumolo.
Id say 650 a season is the most we should pay.
I agree that he is not worth a million but I have changed my mind about him lately.Jake, at this stage is not worth one million, Taumolo, yes, probably along with Bromwich.
Jake plays a different style to the one that will attract the really big dollars.
.I'd like to know who these other Props are that are better than or equal to Woods. Apparently there are plenty, wouldn't mind seeing some names.
I'd like to know who these other Props are that are better than or equal to Woods. Apparently there are plenty, wouldn't mind seeing some names.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |