tookey
First Grader
panthers locals with no teethAs much as I'd like to slag off a player from another team old girds was popular with the ladies for sure, especially the ladies that were panthers locals.
panthers locals with no teethAs much as I'd like to slag off a player from another team old girds was popular with the ladies for sure, especially the ladies that were panthers locals.
Does anyone really think that the combined incomes of Manly's roster exceeds that of the Donkeys or Rorters ?
Don't sweat it dude, consider it a minor accounting anomaly, especially compared to any other cap dramas (eg ours is 350K over 5 years compared to Parra 3.5 Million over the same time!!!). The entire game is corrupt, especially the NRL and EVERYl club looks to take any advantage they can, and then worry later if they were legal. Nothing is pure in a competitive environment like the NRL or any major competitive endeavour. They test the limits of every aspect of the game they can to find an edge, that's comptition.If "we have" cheated, I will be asking for my membership money back for the years involved as I did not sign up to pay for corrupt deals. If we have cheated Im out, We always suspect, ask for blood when something is proved about others, but if we have been cheating how farking dumb are we.
haha heard of gummy sharks but not gummy panthers!!!panthers locals with no teeth
50k over. And its only alleged. Small fine. Every club would be doing it and to a greater extent. Nrl and tpas are a jokeKenty said on 360 that there is alleged evidence of the club signing a contract with a player for $150k. But then only registering the contract with the NRL for $100k.
I've never been part of that 'we'. Don't like it from us. Don't like it from them.Mate its no different to what we do when others get busted, really.
Possibly someone who moved miles away down south and another that moved to a foreign country across the ditch...Apparently two former players have turned into whistle blowers..If true who are the disgruntled players.
Can you name 1 club hit with a breach notice that wasn't than found guilty? I can't and if people think Penn is taking the nrl to court over this they are setting themselves up for disappointment. We will do the same as every club we will shout our innocence and in the end pay the fine (hell it's not even a fine just a reduction in the grant) and get on with it. In the end no big deal hopefully it get's Penn fair dinkum in running a football club.
Whether we are guilty or not of this our governance has been a shambles for a long time hiring ceo's sacking ceo's office staff leaving at an alarming rate (some claiming to be bullied) and we still have a bully on the coaching staff he should have been shown the door but as alway's we try to sweep things under the rug well eventually **** catches up with you.
and tarred and feathered!!!Hope they these two are identified
Don't sweat it dude, consider it a minor accounting anomaly, especially compared to any other cap dramas (eg ours is 350K over 5 years compared to Parra 3.5 Million over the same time!!!). The entire game is corrupt, especially the NRL and EVERYl club looks to take any advantage they can, and then worry later if they were legal. Nothing is pure in a competitive environment like the NRL or any major competitive endeavour. They test the limits of every aspect of the game they can to find an edge, that's comptition.
Reading between the lines, there may be a few anomalies the NRL has uncovered, but nothing like the amount first suggested by their 'preliminary findings'.
They issued that breach today in order to save face for having put Manly through the investigation. Some of Manly's objections will be upheld, so when the dust settles a small fine should cover the balance.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |