The pics I saw with players doing promo's for their "sweet new ride" didnt look like $20,000 cars either..
Anyone know who the Mazda 5 are ??
I daresay he's being protected by Manly too.Name and shame the player as he is tarnishing every other player by being protected by Brookvale Mazda
#ManlyGetYourStuffTogether
The sponsorship is another issue but having every Manly player painted as a loose cannon does not make senseI daresay he's being protected by Manly too.
Yet surely tearing up the player's contract is worth far less to Manly than losing the sponsorship of Brookvale Mazda Damn shame to lose it 😡
The sponsorship is another issue but having every Manly player painted as a loose cannon does not make sense
We are not Parra
TPA - players are 'ambassadors for BM'Not trying to nit pick Happily but ... a) Is this a sponsorship or TPA issue .... b) is there a difference ? ......
I'd write to the NRL if I thought they would listen.
I thought it was interesting that Andrew gee was in the coaches box with Broncos attire and a lanyard. Wasn't he meant to be banished after that mystery 300 000 large
Different rules for different clubs I guess
I'd write to the NRL if I thought they would listen.
So are we there yet???
This years?Seems to be a deliberate ploy to stretch out having to make a decision until after the GF
It's the same here, justice delayed is justice denied, and this delay certainly harms Manly.Seems to be a deliberate ploy to stretch out having to make a decision until after the GF and / or well into the off season.
I know it's not the same thing but there's a law (in the usa at least) saying the defendant has the right to a speedy trial. The police can't arrest someone and the DA say oh ok, we'll get to you in 10 years. Just stay in gaol until then.
Well... Manly certainly aren't getting any rights to a speedy resolution.
Who knows.
But you and I both know this isn’t law, it’s “ Toddy’s law” and that’s different ( he’s allowed to make it up as you go along).It's the same here, justice delayed is justice denied, and this delay certainly harms Manly.
If we were allowed to present fresh evidence at the appeal, the appeal should have been decided on what was before the appeal panel, namely Greenberg's original evidence plus whatever we had raised in defence.
If, as Kent has alluded to, Greenberg has been allowed to go off and conduct a further investigation, that seems a flawed process to me. We are appealing against the prosecution finalised last March, not some new prosecution that hasn't even been completed yet.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |