SeaEagle21
Bencher
It's the same here, justice delayed is justice denied, and this delay certainly harms Manly.
If we were allowed to present fresh evidence at the appeal, the appeal should have been decided on what was before the appeal panel, namely Greenberg's original evidence plus whatever we had raised in defence.
If, as Kent has alluded to, Greenberg has been allowed to go off and conduct a further investigation, that seems a flawed process to me. We are appealing against the prosecution finalised last March, not some new prosecution that hasn't even been completed yet.
"It doesn't get more comprehensive than that" Greenberg said those exact words at the press conference when handing down our punishment. He is clutching at straws to save his job and negotiate something to still make him look like he came down hard. He has nothing and looks to have jumped the gun big time and no doubt in the appeal process the QC would have told him the investigation was flawed from a legal perspective.