Yep, the more I think about it the more it makes sense to just take the hit. Rival fans will always believe we are guilty anyway. The press have made it clear already who they are siding with and it is not Manly. If we end this here it will be a minor tarnish on nothing of note and we can start with a clean slate and move on. Had this been about our winning years I would feel different, however it is covering the worst 5 years in our modern history so who gives a toss. If there is one thing for sure it is that it will be forgotten quicker than an international phone number after a couple of weeks, and the league media will go chasing another ambulance looking for a story.
The world is trial by media these days in they have us guilty already. Move on!
The Mole tweeted that Manly were cheats the day the NRL Investigation began 😎I’ve been hammering Rothfield and Moley on Twitter ( nicely I’m never a dickhead) , no replies from them but lots of activity on my Tweets.
Moley reckons he’s seen enough of the files to know we are cheats and shouldn’t be playing for points in 2018.
Very harsh words!!
I think doing this is even more important now that there is huge uncertainty over Lottoland. Pay the fine ASAP and move forward clean, because if they are fighting this next year and we have no major sponsor, the club is finished.Yep, the more I think about it the more it makes sense to just take the hit. Rival fans will always believe we are guilty anyway. The press have made it clear already who they are siding with and it is not Manly. If we end this here it will be a minor tarnish on nothing of note and we can start with a clean slate and move on. Had this been about our winning years I would feel different, however it is covering the worst 5 years in our modern history so who gives a toss. If there is one thing for sure it is that it will be forgotten quicker than an international phone number after a couple of weeks, and the league media will go chasing another ambulance looking for a story.
The world is trial by media these days in they have us guilty already. Move on!
Remove "human" with "pile of dog ****" and I agree totally.
Releasing Blake green made all the difference... Signing Thompson must have been unnoticed.The whole thing is still very confusing!
Manly are claiming they didn't do anything wrong and were cap compliant, NRL thinks differently and accuses Manly of illegal handling of tpa's basically saying we were doing under the table payments.
Because of this those payments which Manly thought were not part of the cap have now been deemed to be part of the cap? Putting Manly above the cap limit? Blake Green goes and we become cap compliant, so we are not docked any competition points but are unable to sign any more players for 2017.
As a punishment we are fined 500k and have to take 660k off the cap over the next 2 years for rorting the system!
Manly still claim innocence yet NRL with their 800k documents saying evidence is black and white.
Hopefully it just blows over now and we can concentrate on the footy.
So if we think it is only about tpa’s, why were the nrl apparently telling us to get under the cap so not to lose points? That would say we were also over the cap, and apparently did not replace green so to stay under the cap
Just for the sake of salary cap conversation what would stop someone like Russell Crowe buying a few houses in the UK as an incentive for the Burgess boys. Would that be beyond the NRLs jurisdiction ?
Cheers for making me famous SPARTAN, never thought I'd make the big leagues... Aka Silvertails.
You missed my reply:
Thanks Paul. But why are they willing to "drop it" for the Panthers but not for Manly...? A promise of a TPA was made. That took Maloney off the market.
Kents reply:
Because the system is a joke. The NRL failed miserably again here. They should have looked more deeply. Instead they let it go, further undermining the integrity of the game.
Even Kent can see how unfairly we are being treated. That's a good thing. He will ask questions and that's what we want from the media....
Or a video of Greenberg self-immolating.Love to see Barrett release a video with him burning that warning letter on it.
What a joke.
I've called Kent out on it in the past and asked him if being an NRL advocate affects his views and he danced around it saying that everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
It poses a very real question...
Why was Bozos named even mentioned if they cannot force him to be apart of the investigation?
Why is anything to do with his records even being put out there?
This is an NRL investigation. The NRL has no right to have anything to do with Fulton because he no longer holds a position within the NRL yet they have tarnished his name and leaked info to the telecrap...
Surely this spells defamation of the highest order? Can they legally do what they've just done?
Being that I'm dumb, could you enlightened ones clarify a couple of questions floating in my eagle mind;
1. Toddy at his presso said that it would be inappropriate to name the players, yet on Fox same day- Buzz comes right out after DCE leaves and names DCE and Walks as culprits - so how id Buzz find out, why has nothing been said, so much for the not naming - THERE NEEDS TO BE AN INVESTIGATION! - who leaked the intel and they should be sacked.
2. Someone needs to come out and tell us how much do we have left in our salary cap to buy 2 more players for this year. Are we releasing Lussick to free up a few more hundred and then looking for 3 players?
3. If like many are suggesting in the uniformed world that Manly got off lightly, then would we appear. If we don't appeal then that is an admission of guilt (and given The Cricket situation), then does the club owe everyone a Truthful account of what happened and why? If we did it we should be more transparent. We are better than the other clubs so we should lead the way. Then Yes, we cheated but we could still hold our heads high.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |