Agent Todd of the AFL.Greenberg is the best CEO the AFL have ever had.
Rock cakes taste better than fish...Big day for anti Manly sentiment on social media.
I had a world record ( for me) day yesterday with over 250 likes, mentions and retweets.
I’m lucky if I get 10 a week usually!
Today, I’m at home making Rock Cakes and Scones ( weather not conducive to fishing).
**** them all really , going off half cocked and that includes most of the journo’s who don’t do any research just plagiarise someone else’s work and have no ****ing idea.
Mob of pricks the lot of them!
Ymmmmm rockcakes
Rock cakes taste better than fish...
It's the grey area of tpa's which is why they are so dodgy. An example of the Manly situation was that Manly said to the player we have a 500k contract but we know you want 600k and we will do our best endeavour to get you the extra 100k you want (thru tpa's).NRL360 reporting that Manly used 'best endeavours' whereas the NRL redefines that term as 'guarantee'
"DEFINITION of 'Best Endeavors' A term commonly found in commercial contracts, that places upon the party given such an undertaking, the obligation to use all efforts necessary to fulfill it. "Best endeavors" places a party under a stricter obligation than "reasonable endeavors."
All that would need is a 21st century Terry Hill to take it to court for 'restriction of trade' earningsIt's the grey area of tpa's which is why they are so dodgy. An example of the Manly situation was that Manly said to the player we have a 500k contract but we know you want 600k and we will do our best endeavour to get you the extra 100k you want (thru tpa's).
Easiest way to stop cap rotting is to scrap the tpa's all together. That way everyone's contract needs to be included in the cap
NRL360 reporting that Manly used 'best endeavours' whereas the NRL redefines that term as 'guarantee'
"DEFINITION of 'Best Endeavors' A term commonly found in commercial contracts, that places upon the party given such an undertaking, the obligation to use all efforts necessary to fulfill it. "Best endeavors" places a party under a stricter obligation than "reasonable endeavors."
Why can't we just have a normal season
It's the grey area of tpa's which is why they are so dodgy. An example of the Manly situation was that Manly said to the player we have a 500k contract but we know you want 600k and we will do our best endeavour to get you the extra 100k you want (thru tpa's).
Easiest way to stop cap rotting is to scrap the tpa's all together. That way everyone's contract needs to be included in the cap
Huh, It's against NRL Cap rules to guarantee.If that’s the case then isn’t the best way to manage this by having the deal and if the club is guaranteeing it, attach an unconditional undertaking from the club to the player that the player can call on if they don’t get paid? It’s attached to the contract when it’s submitted. Problem solved.
Settle on the meaning and if it means guarantee it’s pretty easy to manage. Do the same as the construction industry.Huh, It's against NRL Cap rules to guarantee.
Hence our current predicament. 😕
Kent was just highlighting why Manly believe that they did not legally guarantee, whilst the NRL equate the two legal terms - incorrectly 😎
Best Endeavours =/= Guarantee in contract law
Agree for future contracts, but it doesn't help us ATMSettle on the meaning and if it means guarantee it’s pretty easy to manage. Do the same as the construction industry.
Kent also quoted Greenturd's comment about the '800,000 examined items, the most thorough investigation ever undertaken by the NRL...'
Then he showed the 2v interview where 2v says no one interviewed him.
Even though he was the head coach for the initial 3 years of the breach 😕
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |