Didn't need that to finish. When was the last time we let in 50?
12 years ago. This is a reality check. We are not deep enough to rest players, and with The Storm + The Roosters coming up, we may be out of the 8 quite soon.Didn't need that to finish. When was the last time we let in 50?
Better fire up for the upcoming month, baz and the players threw this game away before the game begin to sacrifice for a few tough weeks coming up.
If we were full strength and threw this up I'd be blowing up big time but considering the side it isn't totally worth exploding for
Well if we finish out if the eight by 2 points ormiss out on the eight by differential it will be this game that I will be blowing up aboutBetter fire up for the upcoming month, baz and the players threw this game away before the game begin to sacrifice for a few tough weeks coming up.
If we were full strength and threw this up I'd be blowing up big time but considering the side it isn't totally worth exploding for
The young guys coming in tried their best but really that many new players coming in combined with a lacklustre mentality coming in we really should've been pumped 60-0.
Mate if you're blaming the rThe refereeing in this game is juniors. A fuking disgrace. How the fuk do they get a penalty when Lussick is taken out.
Agree mate, I thought Parker was a stand out. Although I would've been a stand out today.50 points on us. I tipped the dragons but I didn't think they'd put that on us. 7 players out doesn't help but that was ****e.
Parker looks like a first grader for sure, so at least one positive.
Didn't the sharks put 70 past us in 2005?27 June 2004. We lost 50-16 in Newcastle.
There's no way with the actual side back that we'll miss the 8, however, the 4 seems out of reach now. Unless we, as I mentioned, go on a winning run due to the refreshed playersWell if we finish out if the eight by 2 points ormiss out on the eight by differential it will be this game that I will be blowing up about
Didn't need that to finish. When was the last time we let in 50?
We need a starting front rower of his style. Not an impact bench prop. I think if Lussick started at prop we'd have been better off earlier onand some think we don't need a front rower to replace BJ....
Didn't the sharks put 70 past us in 2005?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |