Sea Eagle 4 Life
Bencher
Tommy T stays with Manly:
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/t...s/news-story/40fc9e664e9a0fd96cf2dba593ba6f2b
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/t...s/news-story/40fc9e664e9a0fd96cf2dba593ba6f2b
He’s on $1.3 million until the end of next year, so we’re still saving $400k. That is basically an extra first grader somewhere else for 2027. When combined with Jake’s new contract, it’s likely in marquee territory.900K
So much for him wanting less money because he felt he wasn't providing value.
I suppose he thinks he was providing just a little less value than his 1.1 million
He’s on $1.3 million until the end of next year, so we’re still saving $400k. That is basically an extra first grader somewhere else for 2027. When combined with Jake’s new contract, it’s likely in marquee territory.
With any luck that $900k also includes the long serving player allowanceHe’s on $1.3 million until the end of next year, so we’re still saving $400k. That is basically an extra first grader somewhere else for 2027. When combined with Jake’s new contract, it’s likely in marquee territory.
It's great because at his best he's a match winner. I just hope and prey we get that $2.2mil worth of match winning performances over the next 2 years because by god we're going to need them. If we don't get at least 35 games minimum out of him then 2027 should see the end of it.Typical Manly: even the good news is tempered with bad news and media spin. But at least this will mean Tommy is locked in for another two seasons. That's not so bad, is it?
Jake shouldn’t get an extension at all. He should move into an off field role.Tom is not worth 900K; he hasn’t performed consistently at that level since 2021. IMO even offering him 750K over three years would have posed a significant risk for the club.
We also need to clarify Jake’s extension for 2027. I think any offer above 450K-500K raises even more serious concerns.
I agree, but I think we all know he will be getting one. He will be our captain next season as well.Jake shouldn’t get an extension at all. He should move into an off field role.
I guess its got a bit for everyone, instead of signing Tom for 800k on a 3yr deal its a 1yr on 900k. If Tom goes well next season, we won't begrudge him the extra 100k in 27.Tom is not worth 900K; he hasn’t performed consistently at that level since 2021. IMO even offering him 750K over three years would have posed a significant risk for the club.
We also need to clarify Jake’s extension for 2027. I think any offer above 450K-500K raises even more serious concerns.
The issue is why our management thought it be good to offer him 900k in the first place. Our management are systematically breaking our club down. why was Shuster offered 800k, why do we only have 2 players signed long term and one being a winger? Our path to success died alongside Bozo imoTom is not worth 900K; he hasn’t performed consistently at that level since 2021. IMO even offering him 750K over three years would have posed a significant risk for the club.
We also need to clarify Jake’s extension for 2027. I think any offer above 450K-500K raises even more serious concerns.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
24 | 19 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
![]() |
24 | 17 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
![]() |
24 | 16 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
![]() |
24 | 15 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
![]() |
24 | 15 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
![]() |
24 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
![]() |
24 | 13 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
![]() |
24 | 13 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
![]() |
24 | 12 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
![]() |
24 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
![]() |
24 | 10 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
![]() |
24 | 8 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
![]() |
24 | 6 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
![]() |
24 | 6 | 18 | -300 | 18 |