maybe creativity is just not in his genesI don’t want to Strauss the point too much, but you’re right.
maybe creativity is just not in his genesI don’t want to Strauss the point too much, but you’re right.
Agree, but even if both have the same talent and potential I'm taking the bigger guy every day rather than the one who's going to always struggle with size.From what I’ve seen is pretty crafty around the ruck… does not scream out and out superstar, but then does Simpkins?
If we were spending salary cap to bring in a top-notch number nine, then I would get it just not sure that Simkins is top-notch, and therefore would rather see the money spent somewhere else
I've been wrong many times so I don't like to come off like a know-it-all, but to my eyes, I think it's not first grade standard. I see a similar problem with Tom Starling at Canberra. They're both quick and nuggety and can make a strong dart but they just don't have that consistent crisp service. Gordon can throw a nice right to left spiral, but it's after pausing with his hands on the ball at the ruck. The left to right passes are tragic. He seems like a ball of energy, a great young fella and good for team morale. I can see him being effective for 20 minutes in a game but I want Manly to have a genuine 9 that can provide service to our excellent halves. I put that above the odd darting run. But like I said, just the opinion of an arm chair critic.Go to admit I’m not was a lot of him in lower grades… is he that bad?
Fair enough… the thing that interested me when I compared the two was that Gordy has a better defensive record… mind you, Simpkins has played a LOT more NRL…Agree, but even if both have the same talent and potential I'm taking the bigger guy every day rather than the one who's going to always struggle with size.
Bozo I am not saying my love for Gordy is based on anything factualHere is another perspective view ...
It is obvious that we have lacked a match winning class hooker for years now
And a match winning Dominant Hooker signing would have an absolute Dominant Positive response on here
Touted as better than Harry grant as a junior player, they would have been at the club at the same time, not sure if they were duelling over the position though.Did Simpkin battle it out for the hooker role with Harry Grant when he was at thje Tigpies? If he learnt a thing or two from him it would be handy.
Talau has been really good since he has been in first grade at Manly.Wow some people are really talking up Talau he has had a couple of good games let's not over state his improvement.
Yeah he's only been our most consistent back after copping a hiding from naysayers in the preseason and blown everyone's expectations out of the water. Hilarious.It's farking hilarious ! People using Tommy Talau as the pin up boy now for benchmarking ! Hahaha.
I love Gordy too and I hope he lives up to his potentialBozo I am not saying my love for Gordy is based on anything factual
Ok so why did we let him go?If you can get the premier hooker (well at least top 3) in the game, then you get him
I thought he was a terrible signing but happy to say it seems I was wrong… incredibly safe at the back so far and making good yardage out of the backfield…Talau has been really good since he has been in first grade at Manly.
He really got the better of Staggs who is rated as one of the better centres in the game. He has consistently been one of Manlys best.
So yeah, he deserves talking up because some on here thought he was just another scrub from the wooden spooners.
Credit where its due.
You’re only human.I have a really catchy succinct nickname for Jake (we already have one of those..).
How about "Homer's next of"....
They'll be shouting it from the hill in no time*
*disclaimer.....I have been reading too many of @Terry Zarsoff posts 😉
Ok so why did we let him go?
What's Manly? A ham sandwhich? They wanted him and they're a pretty decent club by all accounts.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |