I use my own terms, my own stats and i am not a coach.You are definitely a fat guy on a couch who coaches his kids under 9's team.
I've never heard an NRL coach speak like this.
The terminology is ruck recognition, crispness of service, and width of pass.
Standard deviation? are you studying statistics at university you imposter?
Others said i was Kelly Egan and i mentioned several times i am not and still wasn't believed, you go figure what to do in that scenario Ironstine.... (maybe after a while you flip it for entertainment value to the few who wouldn't believe in the facts----some say Jesus did the same thing)You pick and choose when you show up here and most of us have a life outside this site (to illustrate I’ve just machine gunned four little nuggets and am waiting for the schnitzel to void) so you give yourself a pretty big wrap. And that’s the problem with you mate. You think you know too much/so much. I’m guessing you’ve never pulled a boot on and in all honesty you occasionally make a good point but just so you know honey catches more flies than vinegar. God I hope you really are Kelly Egan like you pretended/ alluded to members on this site that you were/are. The alternative is too depressing.
Interesting reading very passionate views on here
IMO Pound for pound and dollar for dollar we have the best value hooker in the comp that compliments our winning team very well
. For such a young player he shows great composure as as well as toughness and is also very skillful . He also seems to have the opposition in 2 minds when has the ball and like every good hooker he gives good service
Dollar for dollar yes, not pound for pound in the defensive stakes.My point exactly @BOZO and the very reason I hit straight back at @Technical Coach very early on in this tread.
Others said i was Kelly Egan and i mentioned several times i am not and still wasn't believed, you go figure what to do in that scenario Ironstine.... (maybe after a while you flip it for entertainment value to the few who wouldn't believe in the facts----some say Jesus did the same thing)
I agree with you as I see what you see in FainuMy point exactly @BOZO and the very reason I hit straight back at @Technical Coach very early on in this tread.
Pound for pound also implies toughness as he has proven to be a very durable player.Dollar for dollar yes, not pound for pound in the defensive stakes.
Have nothing against the bloke, my gripe is with every new found talent that hits first grade is seen as the "next big thing" and 90% never are, in part because they are over-rated, or become comfortable or the pressure and expectations applied are too much for a young player to handle.You Wish....LOL.. Give it up now @Technical Coach, save whatever credibility you have left ( If An..y as your burying yourself deeper and deeper), You don't like Mase, its that simple ( read your previous posts and whenever he is mentioned you come out blazing ).. That's cool thats your choice , BUT don't try defending it here on a Sea Eagles forum where the majority of posters love the guy, just on his effort alone and what he brings to our team, his Manly through and through. A WINNER
Because he is lauded too much here and there needs to be balance.Fainu is killing it. In attack and defence.
What is interesting is the microscope TC puts him under and why, why not The other 16players?
Of course he is not perfect, what 21yo is? What NRL hooker is?
The trolling has been fun to watch but it's going nowhere unlike my man Manase
How do you know he is not doing exactly as the coaches want?Have nothing against the bloke, my gripe is with every new found talent that hits first grade is seen as the "next big thing" and 90% never are, in part because they are over-rated, or become comfortable or the pressure and expectations applied are too much for a young player to handle.
Fainu has areas that need working on in his game like any other player, if i didn't mention these areas Fainu on this site would come across as the complete package already by the sound of things.
When i see Fainu sprinting not ambling on kick chase (defence and attack) staying on his toes and not resting in the middle during high defensive workloads, when his first contact is dominant or composed contact on a regular basis in defence---or should i say "D" to come across with more coaching credentials and his passing game from dummy half has more creativity and width to it i will say so.
So a Coach would want a hooker to lack defensive energy and intensity yeah right.How do you know he is not doing exactly as the coaches want?
With the coaching staff we have hooker would be a topic well covered.
But we are 5th on the ladder.So a Coach would want a hooker to lack defensive energy and intensity yeah right.
A Coach might say pace yourself at times to not take away from your impact at Dummy Half but even that would be a stretch because it encourages laziness.
Dollar for dollar yes, not pound for pound in the defensive stakes.
The most heated thread in a long while that didn’t contain a single reference of God, Christianity, Israel Folau, Sexuality or religion.Well hasn’t this been a fun thread ?
technical coach is god.. just ask himThe most heated thread in a long while that didn’t contain a single reference of God, Christianity, Israel Folau, Sexuality or religion.
as it sounds pathetic
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |