harsh but entirely fair.Cannot understand how “ElLiOt Is SaFe” is still a solid point...? How is he safe?
Is being out of position for every grubber kick ‘Safe’?
Is getting manhandled back into the ingoal ‘safe’?
Is adding literally NOTHING to our attack - actually no, DETRACTING from it as he can’t do a single thing and the ball dies when it goes to him - SAFE?
Being able to catch a high ball doesn’t justify first grade. My grandma could catch a high ball with no pressure put on her a couple times too.
The point is that there are better backup fullbacks for any minimum NRL salary. Nicho Hynes at Melbourne, Caleb Aekins at Penrith, Tex Hoy at Newcastle. Oh wait... Luke Metcalf and Albert Hopoate at Manly Sea Eagles too?!?
Sacrificing 12+ points in attack every game to have a guy who can catch a high ball is not safe. I would rather a kid who will contribute to two tries and then bomb a high ball than a bloke who can catch a bomb but will cost us 2 tries a game and not add anything in attack.
The bloke sucks and as long as he is playing in the 1 I won‘t be blocking out time to watch.
There is no we should not be trying Albert and or Metcalf (who if he has any experience at 9 should be given a run at the 14) .
I will be really upset if Guac is replaced as a starter for Waddel or Jetski next week ,he earned his spot on Friday and deserves the chance to keep it.
Same with Funa and even when Walker is back same with Cust
From what I can see Elliot has to go for Albert or Metcalf ,George has to go for iether of Miske or Funa depending if Parker is brought back in this week .
so for me against the Knights and hoping for a dry track for Alberts debut
DCE
Cust
Schuster
Funa
Suli
Garrick
Albert
Paseka (is going great ATM must of checked himself out in the mirror and worked out "im a big Motherf*&%$r )
Keppe
Guac
Sirro
Jake
Marty
Sipley
Joel (maybe more effective off the bench)
Metcalf