Bomb Voyage
Reserve Grader
Not sure if it is seibs or flanno or dymock but the distinct lack of venom in defence past two games is very dissapointing, game one was amazing, game 2 started well, then it dissapeared. Who do I blame for that?
The coaching team have done a great job.Seibs still in the positive?
Personally I thought his first mistake was not replacing Johns with Weekes at 5/8th at half time.
His first mistake was picking Harper in the centres. His second mistake was not picking Lawton in the seventeen at all. Weekes into five-eight, with Lawton into the centres, would have made a massive difference to how that game played out. Johns on the bench with Bullemore, Keppie and Burbo would have been a smarter move than playing him at five-eight from the get-go. Long story short, he needs to pick our best players (in some cases out of position - Lawton, Weekes), and not choose our second-string players before them (Johns, Harper etc).Seibs still in the positive?
Personally I thought his first mistake was not replacing Johns with Weekes at 5/8th at half time.
The players? 😎Not sure if it is seibs or flanno or dymock but the distinct lack of venom in defence past two games is very dissapointing, game one was amazing, game 2 started well, then it dissapeared. Who do I blame for that?
Not sure if it is seibs or flanno or dymock but the distinct lack of venom in defence past two games is very dissapointing, game one was amazing, game 2 started well, then it dissapeared. Who do I blame for that?
Seibs still in the positive?
Personally I thought his first mistake was not replacing Johns with Weekes at 5/8th at half time.
Maybe we could try watching Penrith. They maintain defensive intensity for 80 minutes, all season.I was listening to a Croker interview and he said the extra venom in defence used up a lot of gas in the tank the reason we fell away at the end of the Parra game.
I guess we are trying to manage how long we can maintain that defensive intensity while playing a full 80 minutes
You could so easily drop this post into any thread from the past 4 years and just replace seibs name with the 'he that will not be named' hasler.His first mistake was picking Harper in the centres. His second mistake was not picking Lawton in the seventeen at all. Weekes into five-eight, with Lawton into the centres, would have made a massive difference to how that game played out. Johns on the bench with Bullemore, Keppie and Burbo would have been a smarter move than playing him at five-eight from the get-go. Long story short, he needs to pick our best players (in some cases out of position - Lawton, Weekes), then choose our second-string players before them (Johns, Harper etc).
Noted @EOL now nesting on the GC However, it's pretty bloody obvious that Lawton is a better player than Harper for example. Therefore, Lawton should be picked first. Yes, I am aware that its simply a matter of opinion, but that's generally what a forum is for. I have been extremely supportive of Seibold & Co and will continue to be so. However, I will also continue to criticise them, IMHO when further mistakes are made. Jack Gibson was a pretty fair coach, and his philosophy was based on the same concept suggested by me (and others) on how he picked his sides. Yes, Seibold made a selection mistake against the Knights. He will probably make some more in the future. I will support him to the "beast" of my ability regardless.You could so easily drop this post into any thread from the past 4 years and just replace seibs name with the 'he that will not be named' hasler.
As much as I feel I know what makes the world go round don't you think our head coach( be it seibs or Hasler) might just have more knowledge than you or me?
When you say pick our best players none of us know who that is other than a few guys named Turbo and dce and possibly Hamole.
My point is this was a huge criticism of Des over the years even thou he had vastly more knowledge and success than any of us and here we are starting to call out Seibs for exactly the same thing.
Let the coach coach and let's just support to the beast of our ability.
You could so easily drop this post into any thread from the past 4 years and just replace seibs name with the 'he that will not be named' hasler.
As much as I feel I know what makes the world go round don't you think our head coach( be it seibs or Hasler) might just have more knowledge than you or me?
When you say pick our best players none of us know who that is other than a few guys named Turbo and dce and possibly Hamole.
My point is this was a huge criticism of Des over the years even thou he had vastly more knowledge and success than any of us and here we are starting to call out Seibs for exactly the same thing.
Let the coach coach and let's just support to the beast of our ability.
The best answer to the coaching evaluation is that it is too early in the season as there are still lots of chapters to be written this season and the next chapter and our test of character is how we respond against the Benchmark in the compIt’s early in the season.
He shoudn't have been near first grade for ages but he keeps getting picked ......Harper should not be anywhere near 1st grade until he can stop looking so average at Blacktown.
Can we get 2021 habits back pls (+ better defence)They say old habits aren't easy to break! We did look like the 2022 side on the weekend but let's see how the coaches and players respond this week!
He shoudn't have been near first grade for ages but he keeps getting picked ......
wasn't trying to be combative so sorry if it came across that way. Just saying that we all have our opinion that most of the time is not as informed as the man in charge.Noted @EOL now nesting on the GC However, it's pretty bloody obvious that Lawton is a better player than Harper for example. Therefore, Lawton should be picked first. Yes, I am aware that its simply a matter of opinion, but that's generally what a forum is for. I have been extremely supportive of Seibold & Co and will continue to be so. However, I will also continue to criticise them, IMHO when further mistakes are made. Jack Gibson was a pretty fair coach, and his philosophy was based on the same concept suggested by me (and others) on how he picked his sides. Yes, Seibold made a selection mistake against the Knights. He will probably make some more in the future. I will support him to the "beast" of my ability regardless.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |