You're just answering a question with another (unrelated) question. The video I posted is really just a factual account on the arrest of Galileo and the reasoning behind it - it's not biased atheist dogma. Galileo was specifically mentioned and there seemed to be a large amount of confusion around what he believed and if/how/why he was persecuted. This video aims to clear that up.
In regard to your article, I'm unclear what it's point is. I s there a single statement question you can ask me that describes exactly what the problem is? How can the article claim that something is impossible but then give the possibility as an actual number. If it is impossible then the odds of it occurring is 0.
If you want to consider the world to be 5000 years old - then yeah it probably wouldn't happen. But you may not be considering how very small a ttime that humans have existed when compared to the estimated age of the earth.
View attachment 13541
What's more, scientists are getting much closer to creating something that would be considered to be a living cell within a test environment (and without the need for millions of years of chance):
Built from the bottom up, synthetic cells and other creations are starting to come together and could soon test the boundaries of life.
www.nature.com