We flogged the best defensive team in the comp.Judging Seibs on tonight's game
1. Having Koula on the bench ended up being a master stroke (albeit, accidentally)
2. Croker at dummy half for 80 was really poor, IMO. I’d prefer to see a developing Simpkin there plying a true dummy half trade… may be too late for that now.
3. Did he get the forwards up for tonight after last week’s debacle? I don’t know.
TBH, I really don’t know. If so, why couldn’t he get our forwards up last week with so much to play for? I get the adversity of the officiating, but that was a really poor response.We flogged the best defensive team in the comp.
Do you think that was an accident?
I think the proof was in the result,Judging Seibs on tonight's game
1. Having Koula on the bench ended up being a master stroke (albeit, accidentally)
2. Croker at dummy half for 80 was really poor, IMO. I’d prefer to see a developing Simpkin there plying a true dummy half trade… may be too late for that now.
3. Did he get the forwards up for tonight after last week’s debacle? I don’t know.
For me, the ONLY measure of success is Premierships. Come back at the end of each season & we can talk about the coach once that has been decided.
I mean, yes and no. Absolutely we should always be aiming to win a premiership, but often putting yourself in a position to do that takes more than one season. You can't say every coach who doesn't win the premiership this year is a failure. It depends where you're starting from and what you've got to work with, and as long as you're going getting closer to a premiership and not further away, you're probably doing okay. I can't believe I'm about to say this, but success isn't always a straight line…For me, the ONLY measure of success is Premierships.
. You can't say every coach who doesn't win the premiership this year is a failure.
We definitely needed a change from Des Mark 2We definitely needed a change from Des,
That makes for a lot of failures, BOZO. It also ignores coaches who have won a premiership, like Ricky Stuart did in his very first year (2002), and haven't done anything much since. Has he been entitled to bask in that glow for the last 22 years?You can say that a coach who has not won a premiership in their coaching career has failed to Performed to Premiership winning standards
We will agree to disagree and Happy Fathers day
Ricky did win a premiership in his very first year and he he is entitled to bask in his historic Premiership winning Glory because at the time he preformed to premiership winning standardsRicky Stuart did in his very first year (2002), and haven't done anything much since. Has he been entitled to bask in that glow for the last 22 years?
Why would I do that when I have been a diehard Eagles fan for 60 years? I just have higher expectations and standards than you do.By the way what did Seibold do to you? go back to the Broncos forum.
I don't disagree conceptually, and I agree it was time to part company with De$$ie, but Seibold is a failed Donkey's coach so is under suspicion from the get go. I have seen very little from him to suggest he is a Premiership winning coach, rather I suspect he is a Premiership standard BS artist.I mean, yes and no. Absolutely we should always be aiming to win a premiership, but often putting yourself in a position to do that takes more than one season. You can't say every coach who doesn't win the premiership this year is a failure. It depends where you're starting from and what you've got to work with, and as long as you're going getting closer to a premiership and not further away, you're probably doing okay. I can't believe I'm about to say this, but success isn't always a straight line…
I'm still 50/50 on Seibold. We definitely needed a change from Des, but I wasn't sure Seibs was the best choice. There are parts of him I really like (he's good with the media and seems to be good with the players) and parts that rub me the wrong way (the "work-ons", the "free throw at the stumps", etc). But his recruitment decisions have been pretty good, his player selections have not been stagnant, and the team has shown improvement overall, as have individual players. I reckon he probably deserves an extension.
That said, it's beyond important that he and the team don't think they've done enough this season and can phone it in from here on in. The next couple of games are vital. There's a big difference between finishing fifth (or sixth) and seventh, as there is between winning an elimination final and losing one. We probably don't have enough to be genuine contenders this year, but we can put the fear into every team above us and set ourselves up for next year, or the year after that.
And I would consider that a qualified success.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 19 | 5 | 243 | 44 | |
24 | 17 | 7 | 186 | 40 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 275 | 38 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 222 | 38 | |
24 | 15 | 9 | 89 | 36 | |
24 | 14 | 10 | 96 | 34 | |
24 | 13 | 10 | 113 | 33 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -40 | 30 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -127 | 30 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 28 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -126 | 28 | |
24 | 10 | 14 | -70 | 26 | |
24 | 9 | 14 | -62 | 25 | |
24 | 8 | 16 | -168 | 22 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -155 | 20 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -188 | 20 | |
24 | 6 | 18 | -287 | 18 |