HappilyManly
Journey Man
We won't know till the NRL makes it final.Don't think this is entirely correct from what I have read.... Whether it's true or not I don't know....can't remember the exact source or potentially a culmination of a few but it went something like this:
Apparently there is instances where TPA's have been promised to players, with evidence... promised being the key word as it implies the club was using it as leverage to keep or sign the player. Clubs aren't supposed to have anything to do with TPA's but a meet and greet. That's all. But by the sounds, someone has gone a step further and told the players what they will receive.
The NRL has stated that the act of promising a player a TPA is as good as being involved in one as it lures the player to stay at the club when it should have nothing to do with the club.... So although it is a TPA, the club has apparently used it as part of the package (or at least referred to it as part of their package) and the NRL sees this as a breach.
So yes the Brookie granny or other car dealerships may have been completely above board and legitimate but if there is evidence of the club making reference to it as part of the players package or evidence they have told players they will receive a TPA from the granny or dealership... Problem.
This is what I read the NRL will try to use as breaches of the salary cap and some they want included in the 2018 cap.
But Maloney's Riff TPA public comment should be a counter point to your scenario 😛