Shoe1
Journey Man
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...finds-league-crime-links-20171026-gz8szl.html
Fishy, but not manly’s problem.
Fishy, but not manly’s problem.
Every industry, profession would have the very same problem.http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...finds-league-crime-links-20171026-gz8szl.html
Fishy, but not manly’s problem.
To me the fishy bit is winnings from a game ending up in the brothers’ accounts from bets placed by people associated with a certain chap who hadn’t bet before.Every industry, profession would have the very same problem.
Parliament, Judiciary, Police, Doctors ....
I'd rather drugs were limited to footy players, rather than Sydney neurosurgeons 😱
A few have already been deregistered and some even jailed.
Men think with/of their little mate as a priority and sex, money and opiates have been available to indulge in for eons
Kate is missing the big picture, big time 😎
I'd like to see another investigation now looking into where the allegations originated. Perhaps there are some at NRL headquarters who would feel differently though...
Alleged winnings.To me the fishy bit is winnings from a game ending up in the brothers’ accounts from bets placed by people associated with a certain chap who hadn’t bet before.
All relevant and fair points but again i suppose it comes down to and revolves around who or at what level of the club could or would have sanctioned or approved such activities . I presume that Kelly was the C E O then , and would have had a significant input with arranging players contracts and so on , no doubt a few other key officials also involved but again it would be staggering to say the least if this would have again been allowed or permitted at a high administration or official level .Obviously nothing can be ruled out but again just seems such an unlikely scenario for this to have been sanctioned through the proper official administration level and channels at the club .The police have given information to the Nrl though. That's the concern. What is that info. They must have evidence of something. What evidence is it and does it lead back to the club...
Revelations that several high-profile Manly players may have taken secret benefits or payments in cash, in breach of salary cap rules, came to police attention during Strike Force Nuralda's long-running investigation into match-fixing allegations.
Revelations that several high-profile Manly players may have taken secret benefits or payments in cash, in breach of salary cap rules, came to police attention during Strike Force Nuralda's long-running investigation into match-fixing allegations.
As the Brett case proved that while an apology re match fixing would be nice it will do little to change publi perception
Interesting fact - crime commission can not share information gained through their interviews with outside persons/organizations.The police have given information to the Nrl though. That's the concern. What is that info. They must have evidence of something. What evidence is it and does it lead back to the club...
Revelations that several high-profile Manly players may have taken secret benefits or payments in cash, in breach of salary cap rules, came to police attention during Strike Force Nuralda's long-running investigation into match-fixing allegations.
Disagree.Think that would be in relation to other police matters. Like sharing info from one police investigation into another unrelated one. That's why it mentions a fair trial. With the possibility of being charged with an offence, sharing info may prejudice the result.
Don't think it has to do with giving info to other organisations outside the police.
Manly have already stated that they want the NRL to do their re-audit.So your saying that the police have broken the law by giving information to the Nrl but Manly haven't acted on this...? The Nrl have taken information unlawfully and the media isn't jumping all over it?
I have to say, I find that hard to believe.
I have no idea I must admit, I'm just assuming that manly, players, officials and staff would be using this as a defence if it were a possibility. Evidence obtained illegally you would think would have the media all over it.
Why do you suppose they aren't?
I like your optimism. I wish I could be the same but I cant help but think they have it in for us and if there is any evidence of past cap dramas they may try and take achievements off our club like they have done to others in the past... hope not.
From the NRL website:
They must be allowed to pass on information but not names...? No idea. Sounds to complicated to me.
NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg won't be given names of players or officials that have been pivotal to police investigations into match-fixing, but believes the probe into illegal activity will help safeguard the sport.
The NRL is keen to find out the names of some of the individuals that were key figures in the police investigations, however the crime authorities are bound by legal obligations that prohibit the exchange of such information, despite no charges being laid.
"Police are under difficult circumstances for what they can and can’t say to us," Greenberg said.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |