JDB Federal Court Challenge

I note that Jarryd Hayne has pleaded not guilty to Aggravated Sexual Assault.
Unless I'm mistaken one of the allegations is that he inflicted injury to the victim. Isn't this the same charge de Belin is facing?
If so, why are there not the same hysterical media reports that Hayne could face Life behind bars if convicted?
It seems to an outsider like me that Hayne is not facing the same media scrutiny as de Belin.
 
I note that Jarryd Hayne has pleaded not guilty to Aggravated Sexual Assault.
Unless I'm mistaken one of the allegations is that he inflicted injury to the victim. Isn't this the same charge de Belin is facing?
If so, why are there not the same hysterical media reports that Hayne could face Life behind bars if convicted?
It seems to an outsider like me that Hayne is not facing the same media scrutiny as de Belin.
Cause Hayne is no longer a registered NRL player. They don't care now he's out. JDB is.
 
Media reports say Hayne is facing a maximum sentence of 20 years yet de Belin is facing a life sentence. I don't understand the difference. Does anyone?
Also, what has happened to Hayne's alleged 'rape' in the USA?
 
Media reports say Hayne is facing a maximum sentence of 20 years yet de Belin is facing a life sentence. I don't understand the difference. Does anyone?
Also, what has happened to Hayne's alleged 'rape' in the USA?
JDB has added weight due to the victim being allegedly attacked '...in company' :tmi:

Hayne is no longer an NRL story 😎
 

Banned NRL star Jack de Belin’s hopes of having his rape trial finalised before the start of the new season are set to be dashed with reports it is now likely to be delayed until August.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday night that de Belin’s trial, which had been scheduled to begin on February 3, is set to be pushed back due to a backlog of cases.
 
Not sure who Debelin's counsel is but leaving 'a series of complex and sensitive legal arguments' until trial week is a very poor move when delay is such an issue for your client. If the issues were flagged earlier they could have been argued and settled well before the trial. Either the Crown sprang some late surprise (which happens all the time in trials) or Debelin's barrister only turned his mind to certain issues late in the piece (which also happens all the time as barristers are usually fully concentrating on the case they are in the middle of and many have to be 'prodded' to think in advance about their upcoming trials).

Either way a delay until August would be a huge blow for Debelin. And 20 months is a long wait for a trial, at least he has been on bail.
 
If he is found guilty, then he gets what he deserves. But if Debelin is found not guilty, and despite the decision by the earlier court, this could turn into a serious case of Restraint of Trade with the potential, if the NRL are found at fault, of a possible Izzy like payout. Personally I think Izzy is foolishly myopic, but its a perfect example of authorities taking it upon themselves to be judge, jury and executioners in matters not directly related to them. It ended up seriously damaging the RU image. Same could end up applying to the NRL and Debelin
 
1581658432523.png
 
Not sure who Debelin's counsel is but leaving 'a series of complex and sensitive legal arguments' until trial week is a very poor move when delay is such an issue for your client. If the issues were flagged earlier they could have been argued and settled well before the trial. Either the Crown sprang some late surprise (which happens all the time in trials) or Debelin's barrister only turned his mind to certain issues late in the piece (which also happens all the time as barristers are usually fully concentrating on the case they are in the middle of and many have to be 'prodded' to think in advance about their upcoming trials).

Either way a delay until August would be a huge blow for Debelin. And 20 months is a long wait for a trial, at least he has been on bail.

Any chance it’s got something to do with Sinclair recently retaining new counsel? (reported as the reason the proceedings were to start this week instead of in a month’s time - the new barrister had an opening in his calendar that the original one apparently didn’t). Perhaps their respective defence strategies aren’t so closely aligned anymore?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 13 11 0 2 98 26
2 Raiders 14 11 0 3 96 24
3 Warriors 13 10 0 3 35 24
4 Storm 12 8 0 4 171 22
5 Sharks 14 8 0 6 26 18
6 Dolphins 14 7 0 7 146 16
7 Broncos 13 6 0 7 44 16
8 Roosters 13 6 0 7 -18 16
9 Panthers 13 5 1 7 -9 15
10 Cowboys 13 5 1 7 -106 15
11 Sea Eagles 14 6 0 8 22 14
12 Dragons 13 5 0 8 -59 14
13 Tigers 13 5 0 8 -62 14
14 Rabbitohs 14 6 0 8 -88 14
15 Knights 14 5 0 9 -69 12
16 Eels 13 4 0 9 -105 12
17 Titans 13 4 0 9 -122 12
Back
Top Bottom