[Resurrected] Jarryd Hayne, the (forgotten) locked up man

[nightster]

Jails have never stopped mans evil nature

Unless one see the light . They will always remain in the darkness of sin

 

[globaleagle]

Hayne launches fight against guilty verdict

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

www.news.com.au

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

Is it like the nrl judiciary... you appeal and lose - therefore your sentence becomes higher?

 

[wombatgc]

Hayne launches fight against guilty verdict

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

www.news.com.au

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

Is it like the nrl judiciary... you appeal and lose - therefore your sentence becomes higher?

Lawyers rubbing their hands together, and hoping Hayne will continue to appeal.

 

[manlyfan76]

Hayne launches fight against guilty verdict

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

www.news.com.au

Convicted sex offender and former NRL star Jarryd Hayne will return to court next week as he launches an appeal against his rape conviction.

Is it like the nrl judiciary... you appeal and lose - therefore your sentence becomes higher?

What grounds for the appeal?

 

[MadMarcus]

What grounds for the appeal?

He’s appealing under the legal doctrine of “Non ire eius”, which is a Latin term for the English “not his go”.

 

[globaleagle]

What grounds for the appeal?

If you clicked on the article and read through the extensively reported goings on , you would have seen all the answers you seek.

which was:

It is not yet known what the grounds of Hayne’s appeal will be.

(kidding you not - lol)

 

[Waz13]

If you clicked on the article and read through the extensively reported goings on , you would have seen all the answers you seek.

which was:

It is not yet known what the grounds of Hayne’s appeal will be.

(kidding you not - lol)

He’s appealing on the grounds of being an entitled, privileged rich twat who still thinks what he did was ok.

 

[globaleagle]

He’s appealing on the grounds of being an entitled, privileged rich twat who still thinks what he did was ok.

Ah, that must be in another article.

 

[MadMarcus]

He’s appealing on the grounds of being an entitled, privileged rich twat who still thinks what he did was ok.

Was that the grounds George Pell relied on?

 

[manlyfan76]

If you clicked on the article and read through the extensively reported goings on , you would have seen all the answers you seek.

which was:

It is not yet known what the grounds of Hayne’s appeal will be.

(kidding you not - lol)

I clicked on it and glanced over, but the lack of detail in the article had me tuning out tbh.
But appealing because his legal counsel can make more money off him sounds about right.

 

[yokahontas]

He’s appealing on the grounds of being an entitled, privileged rich twat who still thinks what he did was ok.

With the aggravating factor of ‘we’ve been doing this stuff for years and getting away with it, why’s it suddenly a crime?!’

 

[Genius]

Was that the grounds George Pell relied on?

Possibly being not guilty.

 

[globaleagle]

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

No Cookies

www.dailytelegraph.com.au

Jarryd Hayne’s final chance of getting out of jail free has arrived.


On Monday, the former NRL star will appear via Zoom at the Court of Criminal Appeal in an attempt to overturn his sexual assault convictions, for which he continues to maintain his innocence.

The 33-year-old has served six months of a maximum five years and nine months sentence after a jury found the one-time champion footballer guilty of non-consensual sex with a woman he met on social media in 2018.

Hayne, who once earned $1.2 million a season in the NRL, is basing his appeal on what has been described as “legal argument” related to the verdict.

The duration of the appeal, which will be held before a three-person panel of Supreme Court judges, is unlikely to run beyond Monday.

The hearing could be all over within a matter of hours.

 

[Shoe1]

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

No Cookies

www.dailytelegraph.com.au

Jarryd Hayne’s final chance of getting out of jail free has arrived.


On Monday, the former NRL star will appear via Zoom at the Court of Criminal Appeal in an attempt to overturn his sexual assault convictions, for which he continues to maintain his innocence.

The 33-year-old has served six months of a maximum five years and nine months sentence after a jury found the one-time champion footballer guilty of non-consensual sex with a woman he met on social media in 2018.

Hayne, who once earned $1.2 million a season in the NRL, is basing his appeal on what has been described as “legal argument” related to the verdict.

The duration of the appeal, which will be held before a three-person panel of Supreme Court judges, is unlikely to run beyond Monday.

The hearing could be all over within a matter of hours.

“Legal argument” sounds like a surefire winning tactic.

 

[nightster]

are any of those 3 Supreme Court judges hill singers?

 

[globaleagle]

Fallen NRL superstar Jarryd Hayne has argued that his sexual assault conviction ought to be quashed because a jury erred in believing his victim said “no, no, no”, a court has heard.

Jarryd Hayne reveals why he says he should be acquitted of sexual assault

Jarryd Hayne has argued that his sexual assault conviction ought to be quashed because a jury mistakenly accepted his victim said “no, no, no” and because of a “flawed” direction given by the trial judge.

www.news.com.au

"The jury erred in not believing me...and I'm Jarryd Hayne."

 

[The better Robbo]

I actually believe his story. Her story has holes in it left, right and centre. There is a txt msg that she sent to her friends saying that she can't remember if she consented or not. She has said that he forced his hand down her pants but in another story says that he just started feeling her up. One minute she says he didn't stop when she said "no" but then says she can't remember... Then he goes and sits with her and her mum watching TV. Doesn't sound like something you'd do if you just forced yourself on someone. He's probably guilty of being a numbnut and feeling entitled but not what he is actually charged for... just my opinion anyway.

 

[Leader of the Flock]

Looks like he’s out for awhile

Jarryd Hayne sexual assault convictions quashed on appeal, retrial ordered

The former footballer was convicted last year of two counts of sexual intercourse without consent after an incident in Newcastle in September 2018.

www.smh.com.au

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nsw/bombshell-jarryd-hayne-to-face-retrial-after-winning-appeal/news-story/4d3d88a381bb472c081a4471bf645049

 

[The '47ers]

I don't understand (no real surprised there) and obviously I don't know the truth etc etc.
But anyway, do they just keep sending him to trail until he can't get out of it anymore 🤷‍♂️

 

[cc eagle]

He may not go to trial if the DPP don't think they'll get a conviction, same as De-belin, couldn't get a decision so he got off