Inglis ****show will be interesting

[mickqld]

Cue Roberts packing his bags for a one way plane trip to Sydney. God I hate Greenturd and Souffs but geez it'd be worth this to watch them sign Latrell.

 

[Hoppa]

Cue Roberts packing his bags for a one way plane trip to Sydney. God I hate Greenturd and Souffs but geez it'd be worth this to watch them sign Latrell.

Robert’s definitely to South’s. No way Manly can compete with the money Souths have after the incredibly quick decision by the NRL to give Souths salary cap relief after the Inglis retirement.

 

[Tomay]

Yep, this stinks.

We had Nate the Great on our cap one year after he left for another club and then medical retired. As usual, the NRL has it's favourites.

 

[manlyfan76]

Without a doubt the worst administration in Australia and rugby leauge internationally.

 

[Cioran]

I don’t know why people accuse Greenberg of inconsistency. His ruling on Inglis is entirely consistent with all his earlier rulings. He consistently favours a hand full of sides while putting all his energy into screwing over the Sea Eagles. If he were to, in any way, act in the best interests of the Sea Eagles that WOULD be inconsistent.

 

[QueefRichards]

I have a fair scenario for all concerned

Souths can have the money taken off the cap if they get kicked out of the competition again

 

[The Wheel]

What a ducking joke - jeez I hate that bald headed ****stick

 

[ricardo]

Sickening

 

[Tragic Eagle]

Pathetic nepotism

 

[Waz13]

What an absolute disgrace this game is. God I would not give this sport the time of day if Manly didn’t exist. Absolute amateur hour.

 

[Waz13]

Honestly it is the most amateur run professional sport in the history of sport. Fark. Stewart and matai actually had injuries right and couldn’t go on. Inglis could have played on ffs and would have to get his $$ unless this bull**** deal wasn’t done. It’s an embarrassment.

 

[Ned]

Consistency is non existent

 

[HoldenV8]

Yep, this stinks.

We had Nate the Great on our cap one year after he left for another club and then medical retired. As usual, the NRL has it's favourites.

That is part of what absolutely fvcking stinks about this whole deal. As you said, the Big Giant Head left Manly to play for Melbourne, then retired at the end of 2017.....and somehow the NRL decides that his full 2018 contract would count as part of Manly's salary cap in 2018 (and worse still, Manly still had to pay him the remaining year of his contract). Plus there was the fracas about trying to get Stewart and Matai medically retired which never happened despite neither of them never playing again.....and yet its taken the NRL what, about one month to declare that Souffs don't have to carry 1nglis' contract on their salary cap because he decided he wanted to retire???

The NRL certainly plays favourites don't they. Thurston and Smith get $750k testimonials that didn't count to the Cows or Scum salary caps. Souffs don't have to carry 1nglis. Watmough was allowed to be medically retired by the Worms to save their arses from being over the salary cap when even the insurance company said that it was a pre-existing injury. Yet anything to do with Manly, we have to wear the bloody thing.

You know, like the rest of us here I love rugby league, even though I happen to come from an Aussie rules dominated town in an Aussie rules dominated state. But if it wasn't for Manly.....I wouldn't even bother with the NRL, especially with the completely biased way that its currently being run.

 

[Tomay]

Funny isn't it, all the fans want is an unbiased and consistent administration that keeps out of the game as much as possible and maintains an even playing field. They fail to provide us this pretty much every time they make any decision and it stinks.

 

[sheridanstand78]

Greenturd has underlined again, how inept he is as a fair and just sports administrator by allowing the Vermin to get away with this and making life hell for us over Snake and Stevie. When are the clubs going to wake up to this cretin???

 

[manlyfan76]

My daughter and her friends just quit touch footy because of this decision.

 

[ricardo]

My daughter and her friends just quit touch footy because of this decision.

Sad to hear🙁

Truth is this administration is destroying the game with their corrupt decision making. If they want a game with just Storm, Souths, Roosters and Broncos they are going about it the right way.

 

[Disco]

Okay I have a feeling I'm going to get absolutely torched here.......and I'll be honest I haven't gone through this with a fine tooth comb but here it goes

*deep breath*

It a seems somewhat reasonable to me...

My understanding is what he is getting paid (half this years contract, and whatever he gets paid for the rest of the years ambassadorial role) counts towards the cap and what he gets paid next year for his ambassador role counts towards the cap. I think that seems fair?

I mean, he has walked away from his contract right, as in he isn't getting paid the 2 million, so only what he gets paid should count.

Matai and Stewart (argument on whether it should have been medical retirement or not aside) got their full allotment of money no?

Not sure on the details of Nate, but if he got his contract money then it should count, if he walked away from the money than something does stink.


I dunno, maybe I'm being slow here on a Friday morning but IMO whatever a player is getting paid should be in the cap, if a player chooses to retire and give up those payments then it shouldn't be in the cap



Okay.............let the roasting begin

 

[tookey]

The only good thing is that the precedent has now been set

Wait for Hodkinson and Perrett to be given jobs cleaning the football club to get their salaries off our cap only for Greenturd to decline our request

 

[tookey]

Okay I have a feeling I'm going to get absolutely torched here.......and I'll be honest I haven't gone through this with a fine tooth comb but here it goes

*deep breath*

It a seems somewhat reasonable to me...

My understanding is what he is getting paid (half this years contract, and whatever he gets paid for the rest of the years ambassadorial role) counts towards the cap and what he gets paid next year for his ambassador role counts towards the cap. I think that seems fair?

I mean, he has walked away from his contract right, as in he isn't getting paid the 2 million, so only what he gets paid should count.

Matai and Stewart (argument on whether it should have been medical retirement or not aside) got their full allotment of money no?

Not sure on the details of Nate, but if he got his contract money then it should count, if he walked away from the money than something does stink.


I dunno, maybe I'm being slow here on a Friday morning but IMO whatever a player is getting paid should be in the cap, if a player chooses to retire and give up those payments then it shouldn't be in the cap



Okay.............let the roasting begin

The only problem here is why would any business want someone who has been caught drink driving and speeding at the same time, assaulted his girlfriend and received payments. boats and gift cards outside the salary cap as an ambassador?

What sort of example if this going to set for anyone?