There are two main streams in Oz politics:
1. Those who think money is all important and the main driver in life - vote Liberal/Nationals
2. Those who think that a balanced society is all important - vote Labor.
The argument for Libs/Nats is that Labor has zero credibility for balancing a budget and that we risk the entire economy and individual wealth by voting Labor.
For Labor is that they will defend the rights of the underpriveleged and general struggling families.
The truth lies, as always, somewhere in-between.
In this presidential style election we have two leaders. One that has a history of mysogeny (yes, look it up) and used bully-boy tactics through-out Uni and beyond, and the other who has far-left leanings bordering on extreme socialism.
Is Labor socialist? - the answer is no. The middle area of the party ensures that a reasonable level of governance results in the best results overall for most Australians.
If you have huge amounts of wealth and you don't want to risk it then Abbott (and his Howard leaning thinking) is the man for you.
In reality there is not much between the two. Do you have a social conscience? - vote Labor. If you look at society and only want want what you can get out of it for you - vote Lib/Nats.
It looks like it will be close. One thing that sticks out for me is how well Labor guided this country through the GFC. How could Labor have stuffed it up? - oh so easily but they didn't. On those grounds alone they deserve another term.
Think carefully about how you want Australia to head. Is it one dedicated to the big end of town and their corporate greed, or one that looks closely at the need of all the citizens. I have made up my mind - the rest is up to you.