TagMonster
Reserve Grader
On current form, just about any first grade half. My preference would be to go the youth route - there's always a good bunch of up and comers coming through. Spend the money on a couple of hard headed back rowers and some speedsters with potential. Raid penriths juniors. Get a team that can be molded together rather than swapping journeymen every year. In hindsight, we'd be better off with Kane elgy.
Ok, so let me list all the halves playing this weekend and whether I think they would be a clear upgrade over DCE based on current form:
Munster - No
Cronk - Yes
Milford - Maybe
Hunt - No
Reynolds - No
Mybe - No
Hingano - No
Johnson - Yes
Elgey - No
Taylor - No
Gutherson - No
Robson - No
Lamb - No
Hodkinson - No
Walker - No
Reynolds - Maybe
Martin - No
Cleary - No (but I would consider him based on potential)
Keary - No
Pearce - No
Morgan - No
Thurston - Yes
Austin - No
Sezer - No
Moses - No
Brookes - No
Maloney - No
Townsend - No
Widdop - No
McCrone - No
So based on the 30 non-Manly halves playing this weekend I would suggest that only 3 are clearly an upgrade with 2 potentially being an upgrade and one who would very likely be in upgrade over the next year or so. So I would consider swapping him for a total of 6/30 halves playing this weekend. That is hardly "just about any first grade half."
Yes, he is playing poorly by his standards but I would argue that is due to surrounding talent and scheme as much as it is his poor form. A professional athlete doesn't just magically lose his talent overnight, particularly when he is just entering his prime.
I will accept that there are a number of halves that would potentially give us the same quality based on current form for less money, but a lot of those guys are playing at their peak potential. DCE is playing no where near his potential. I'd take the guy with the better upside over an "also ran"
I think a lot of supporters on this forum need to accept that DCE is with the club for a number of years yet. That isn't going to change. To let him walk would be a disaster for our cap and the club wouldn't do it. Wouldn't it be a lot more productive speaking about things the club can actually change like the **** team selections, lack of coaching and poor recruitment rather than a player who is locked into the club for the next 8 years or so?