Can the NRL please explain the difference between bochoc's claim and Snake's?
Don't tell me it was because bochoc was injured by scott at training and they deemed that action to be career ending?? Because that does not make sense, every one knows bochoc was carrying injuries and that one incident, which I am dubious to say ever happened caused anything.
So if this is the difference between the claims of bochoc and Snake then I don't know what to say. Except what utter F%&*^% BS.
Did Snake collide with anyone last year? Did he tackle someone and then that incident could be deemed to be the straw that broke the camels back??
Seriously this is ludicrous and Manly need to hit back. I am not a solicitor, but I tell you what I would think a half decent one could make a case of this rubbish.
Sadly this has been going on for years, one rule for the favoured ones another for Manly.
In most people's eyes we are the Silvertails and deserve to be brought down.
But I agree a precedent has been set, so only time will tell however by the time it's sorted the season will be gone!
Last edited: