Dan79 said:You know there is no truth to it. The best in the business,filth rothfield has been silent on the rumours.
He's silent on it because he's an avid shark supporter.
Dan79 said:You know there is no truth to it. The best in the business,filth rothfield has been silent on the rumours.
When this first broke a few weeks back there was talk of a reduced 6 month ban for players who 'co-operate', in other words give information about others. That was the whole point of inviting the guilty to come forward under their own steam, the prospect of a reduced penalty.Supernintendo Chalmers said:6 month bans...
basically saying we think your suss, might have something on you via phone tap, but have no hard proof / positive tests.
if you had solid proof, the bans would be much more than 6 months.
i love how fast this spreads on twitter, public chinese whispers. no one involved has made any statements, yet everyone with a twitter account knows someone who knows something 'but can't tell'.
Makes sense Bones. Also, am I correct in that Danks didn't work for us in 2011? I'm pretty sure peptides were put on the banned substance list in 2011.bones said:From what Paul Kent said in the radio this afternoon, the problem is with Peptides which were once legal for NRL players to take but have sine been added to the banned substances lists. Manly were the first club ASADA visited so I'm hoping that if our players took them, that it was before they were banned and that's why we haven't had the same dramas the sharks are having after their visit.
niccipops said:Makes sense Bones. Also, am I correct in that Danks didn't work for us in 2011? I'm pretty sure peptides were put on the banned substance list in 2011.bones said:From what Paul Kent said in the radio this afternoon, the problem is with Peptides which were once legal for NRL players to take but have sine been added to the banned substances lists. Manly were the first club ASADA visited so I'm hoping that if our players took them, that it was before they were banned and that's why we haven't had the same dramas the sharks are having after their visit.
Hope none of our boys are involved and I got to say this situation must suck for the Sharkies fans.
As for standing players down from a club point of view, any club's, I'd want to be presented with hard evidence without any shadow of a doubt before standing players down.
If undoubtably guilty then they do the time.
SeaEagleRock8 said:When this first broke a few weeks back there was talk of a reduced 6 month ban for players who 'co-operate', in other words give information about others. That was the whole point of inviting the guilty to come forward under their own steam, the prospect of a reduced penalty.Supernintendo Chalmers said:6 month bans...
basically saying we think your suss, might have something on you via phone tap, but have no hard proof / positive tests.
if you had solid proof, the bans would be much more than 6 months.
i love how fast this spreads on twitter, public chinese whispers. no one involved has made any statements, yet everyone with a twitter account knows someone who knows something 'but can't tell'.
He is silent because he misses all the big headlines and writes all the crap. He has no credibility. I would not print the **** he comes up with on toilet paperswoop said:Dan79 said:You know there is no truth to it. The best in the business,filth rothfield has been silent on the rumours.
He's silent on it because he's an avid shark supporter.
SeaEagleRock8 said:When this first broke a few weeks back there was talk of a reduced 6 month ban for players who 'co-operate', in other words give information about others. That was the whole point of inviting the guilty to come forward under their own steam, the prospect of a reduced penalty.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | -30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -9 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -54 | 0 |