robbiea said:I think him & Watmough not turning up for mad monday speaks volumes..
We will see.
I hope I'm wrong ,but happy with all 3 replacements if not.
Unfortunately Brett is gone
robbiea said:I think him & Watmough not turning up for mad monday speaks volumes..
We will see.
I hope I'm wrong ,but happy with all 3 replacements if not.
Go manly said:robbiea said:I think him & Watmough not turning up for mad monday speaks volumes..
We will see.
I hope I'm wrong ,but happy with all 3 replacements if not.
Unfortunately Brett is gone
TagMonster said:Go manly said:robbiea said:I think him & Watmough not turning up for mad monday speaks volumes..
We will see.
I hope I'm wrong ,but happy with all 3 replacements if not.
Unfortunately Brett is gone
To the toilet? To lunch? Where has he gone?
Bandit said:TagMonster said:Go manly said:robbiea said:I think him & Watmough not turning up for mad monday speaks volumes..
We will see.
I hope I'm wrong ,but happy with all 3 replacements if not.
Unfortunately Brett is gone
To the toilet? To lunch? Where has he gone?
Isn't Brett happily signed up with us for 2 more years at about $850k per season?
Cliffy said:I dont understand why Blair doesn't get bigger wraps. He's tall and as solid as a house under the high ball. hits it up. Can find the line. I don't. Think he's as.comfortable in the centres but dam I see a representative winger. Jorge has some pressure.
A player with size and no power comes down like a bag of s***t . Players like Choc don't have size but they are powerful and Choc was our most damaging runner and hitter . Our pack was last in metres gained in 2014 and lacked aggression and this is why 2V recruited Mason , Vave and Tetevano . Which other top 4 teams would JSL and Starling break into ?Gib the Pom said:Think what stands out for me most is just how many unknowns there are with regards to potential. There are 6/7 players that could burst in to the first 17 this year, and its the most excited I have been for a while with the squad because of this.
For me I prefer to start big in games and rip in early on, so for me that means starting with your big players. Mason and BJ to start in front row, then bring on Starling/Lui/Vave or whoever it might be.
Would love for someone like Tetevano to really step up and claim a starting place in the first team. From what I've seen of him, he's a tough uncompromising runner and very aggressive. Him with Mason starting could be a great combo.
Also what do people think about starting JSL alongside Mason? Would be some size there!!
To be fair, Souths had players like Clark, Turner and Tyrell who are bog average in their team and won the comp.BOZO said:A player with size and no power comes down like a bag of s***t . Players like Choc don't have size but they are powerful and Choc was our most damaging runner and hitter . Our pack was last in metres gained in 2014 and lacked aggression and this is why 2V recruited Mason , Vave and Tetevano . Which other top 4 teams would JSL and Starling break into ?Gib the Pom said:Think what stands out for me most is just how many unknowns there are with regards to potential. There are 6/7 players that could burst in to the first 17 this year, and its the most excited I have been for a while with the squad because of this.
For me I prefer to start big in games and rip in early on, so for me that means starting with your big players. Mason and BJ to start in front row, then bring on Starling/Lui/Vave or whoever it might be.
Would love for someone like Tetevano to really step up and claim a starting place in the first team. From what I've seen of him, he's a tough uncompromising runner and very aggressive. Him with Mason starting could be a great combo.
Also what do people think about starting JSL alongside Mason? Would be some size there!!
BOZO said:A player with size and no power comes down like a bag of s***t . Players like Choc don't have size but they are powerful and Choc was our most damaging runner and hitter . Our pack was last in metres gained in 2014 and lacked aggression and this is why 2V recruited Mason , Vave and Tetevano . Which other top 4 teams would JSL and Starling break into ?Gib the Pom said:Think what stands out for me most is just how many unknowns there are with regards to potential. There are 6/7 players that could burst in to the first 17 this year, and its the most excited I have been for a while with the squad because of this.
For me I prefer to start big in games and rip in early on, so for me that means starting with your big players. Mason and BJ to start in front row, then bring on Starling/Lui/Vave or whoever it might be.
Would love for someone like Tetevano to really step up and claim a starting place in the first team. From what I've seen of him, he's a tough uncompromising runner and very aggressive. Him with Mason starting could be a great combo.
Also what do people think about starting JSL alongside Mason? Would be some size there!!
mickqld said:The centres are a worry. Matai and Lyon are too slow and Matai too injury prone. We lack serious pace in the back line. We needed to let Matai go to the Warriors and find some speed out wide.
Killer03 said:mickqld said:The centres are a worry. Matai and Lyon are too slow and Matai too injury prone. We lack serious pace in the back line. We needed to let Matai go to the Warriors and find some speed out wide.
Seriously??? We have the best centre pairing in the league (IMO). Jamie isn't lightning, but he's got some pace, and has been the top centre in the world for the last 5 years.
Stevie Matai has had his 2 best years ever. He's not only found the line himself, but started setting up his winger.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
4 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
5 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
8 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
9 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
12 | Tigers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -60 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 4 |