Trial v Roosters
- Thread starter SeaEagleRock8
- Start date
Oh, sorry you've lost me. Can only think it was Parker, being blonde, with a 20+ number and was playing towards the end.
Better or the same but must have a good run with injuries we have a good team this year to support.
There is no sugar coating with Parkers hair colour, it' bright Ronald McDonald red.He sticks out like dogs balls out there.
Same diff, its blonder than black or dark brown!
Then who was the player who made the break at the end but penalized for a shepherd??
Could it have been GojetSki ?Same diff, its blonder than black or dark brown!
Then who was the player who made the break at the end but penalized for a shepherd??
Injuries are the key for all teams, if Scam was to do an ACL the Drizzle would be screwed.
Depth has been our issue in recent years but it appears we are better situated this year.
With two spots in the 30 still to be filled , one you’d imagine is being kept for Carney but it will be interesting from who might be left on the market ( assuming we get to use the full $800k we supposedly have left) we go for to fill spot 30.
I’d suggest a centre might be appropriate but not sure if any are left or might be free agents.
The Boys are looking the goods by the sounds of things, it's good to hear that Lachie is holding his own, he will only improve and the forwards are improving and have depth.
The backs have plenty of youth coming thru with the likes of T. Wright and Parker etc. But are still a bit of a worry however they are showing promise.
My main concern is our defence!..... while I think it's okay there are too many lapses in it especially if we have a big lead or towards the end of a game.
I believe if TB concentrate's on that area more it would be a huge factor in getting us in to the top 8 or even top 4. We've showed we can score tries.
We might not be able to buy all the top guns like the hens and the Squeels always seem to do. But if we worked on being as close to... if not the Number one team in defence and succeeded then we will be there at the end.
Last year's run ended partly due to the fact our defence let us down towards the end of the season...... we were 3rd at one stage then it fell apart.
Defence for a full 80 minutes with no lapses in concentration is easier said than done .....
For us having the Best defence or even the second best in the competition would get us to the business end of the season in 2018...
Peter C
Bencher
Ok, perhaps it was, I didn't have a team list and where I was sitting I couldn't see who the interchange players were, but very nearly pulled it off for us .
Peter C
Bencher
I thought it was AFB who was penalised for an obstruction
There seems to be confusion amongst the eye witnesses ......
OK to settle this @Peter C and @Woodsie I just spoke to a guy at the fan day who was at the game. He said both AFB and Parker made breaks in the last 5 minutes or so of the game - first Parker, who was tackled short of the line, then AFB who was penalized for obstruction. Question answered 🙂
For the record, yes both Jetski and J Lussick are blonde but I don't think they played in 1st grade last night, or I didn't see them.
40 years an eagle
Bencher
No offence mate but I hate the idea of TT anywhere other than FB.
I would be happy for Parker to fill in at centre until Dylan returns and deserves a go.
Let's keep as much continuity of positions as possible instead of shuffling the whole team to cover 1 missing player. Parker is not a winger, M Wright is not a centre and not a good enough goalkicker to warrant a place in the side.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
