Jatz Crackers
First Grader
Classic Silvertails stuff right there ;D
clontaago link said:How has Carney beat the ban? I havent heard.
DSM5 link said:Clon, he hasn't, yet. He has the players association support if he wishes to challenge the 09 ban which seems to me indicates a shaky limb for the NRL to sit on. Why did the NRL pick him out to ban for a season and six matches? My guess is to divert attention from the ridiculous rubbish that is their action against SBW. My tip is that the ban will dissolve under litigation. It is unfair and a complete over-reaction to what was an of field indiscretion, not even a police or civil matter..Don't know what Tim Smith has to do with this thread.
Dan link said:I wouldn't have an objection to signing him on an incentive based contract that involved standard for his off field behaviour including a limited alcohol ban.
Maybe on a 50k contract with incentive payments and termination clauses
willstyles link said:[quote author=Dan link=topic=178142.msg193015#msg193015 date=1218501998]
I wouldn't have an objection to signing him on an incentive based contract that involved standard for his off field behaviour including a limited alcohol ban.
Maybe on a 50k contract with incentive payments and termination clauses
Nutzcraw link said:Carney = NO.
Leave him as someone else's problem. These days you can only afford to keep 1 halfback in your squad. You don't want that one to be a dodgy one.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |