The Take on Jake

Better to overpay someone who puts in 100% every game(in the forwards department) than pay someone 50-70% of that whose efforts are inconsistent.

In saying that "if" Jake is on $900,000 he is probably overpaid by $200,000.

I'm not always a fan of the "family club" concept, yes it has it's obvious positives but i think the negatives in the long run out weigh the positives and can hamstrung the club in a variety of ways creating a prolonged downturn.
 
Players salaries aren't directly determined by how well they play, would be nice if they were but it's not reality. They're determined by what rival clubs are willing to pay them. If we tried to pay Jake $700k we would lose him to a club willing to pay more. I think the Turbos are priced just right, to fend off rival clubs offers.
 
Jake is tough and puts in each week.

He has a good offload, for some reason have not seen much of it, some sets he is just looking for a quick play the ball and looking for the next play rather than playing what’s in front of him.

I think Jake is an out and out Prop forward, we have such a good talent base of junior front rowers coming through, Titmus, Fainu and Tuitavake. Not sure if we will see Jake back in the front row for these reasons.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 13 11 0 2 98 26
2 Raiders 14 11 0 3 96 24
3 Warriors 13 10 0 3 35 24
4 Storm 12 8 0 4 171 22
5 Sharks 14 8 0 6 26 18
6 Dolphins 14 7 0 7 146 16
7 Broncos 13 6 0 7 44 16
8 Roosters 13 6 0 7 -18 16
9 Panthers 13 5 1 7 -9 15
10 Cowboys 13 5 1 7 -106 15
11 Sea Eagles 14 6 0 8 22 14
12 Dragons 13 5 0 8 -59 14
13 Tigers 13 5 0 8 -62 14
14 Rabbitohs 14 6 0 8 -88 14
15 Knights 14 5 0 9 -69 12
16 Eels 13 4 0 9 -105 12
17 Titans 13 4 0 9 -122 12
Back
Top Bottom