Terry Zarsoff
First Grader
$20 million. That low?Eels have offered him a 7 year deal, with an option of a further 3 years, valued at $20million
$20 million. That low?Eels have offered him a 7 year deal, with an option of a further 3 years, valued at $20million
That's what is on the books. He also has 3million per year in club backed TPA's and a unit on the river.$20 million. That low?
Try savers? More like try assistsEveryone bagging a Club Legend.... Did you see his try saving tackles last game? Do you honestly think those bombs he diffused wasn't up to standard? He may not be his best, and yes it will be time to move him on this year, but to have him rallying the troops, and reading the play from the back is critical in this must win match. Only an idiot would rest him on Monday, I'm calling BS, this has smokescreen written all over it. I say he plays...
The news came out after 5pm yesterday plus Manly don't play till Monday.Interestingly, its now Saturday morning (election day.....) and I have just checked the SMH and DT and there is nothing about Snake being dropped or rested.
So last year it was Barrett's fault too I suppose..?
Catch 22 situation here with most wanting TT at full back but he is playing injured and if he aggravates it further it may be worse for us in the long run.
Absolutely 100 percent correct.Last year just like this year was an injury ridden nightmare and that is a reasonable excuse for some poor performances and is an excuse that Toovey and Barrett have a right to use for 20% of the performance. However the big difference last year was that when we had a half reasonable side on the paddock we performed remarkably better than this year and even put the cleaners through Brisbane and looked more cohesive and committed. Add to that the bottom eight teams were all performing quite well last year and keeping us low on the ladder. This year the eighth position is there for the taking as most of the bottom eight are performing like garbage hence why we haven't dropped to last position all year. Also regardless of what combination we put out this season we have looked clueless in attack and defence more so in defence and the side looks continually bereft of ideas of how to put teams under pressure with our go forward and we have added Tapau and Myles to last years forward pack. Nobody is expecting this side to challenge for the title, if they are they are off their heads. Having said that we should be playing far better than we currently are regardless of injuries. Titans are currently an example of how I believe we should be performing at the moment. They are a no name side that is concentrating on the basics and working hard as a unit, They look well coached. We look very poorly coached and I don't want to keep hammering Barrett but unless he completely changes what he is doing we will be cannon fodder for the next 3 years.
That should've been a month ago.Tom T is having surgery on his ankle once the season is done.
I would prefer him in the centres![]()
He looked good in last weeks game. I am sure Tom, his parents and the medical staff would not let him keep playing if it could do him further damage.Catch 22 situation here with most wanting TT at full back but he is playing injured and if he aggravates it further it may be worse for us in the long run.
Being serious for a moment.....if Snake was in good form then yes, I too would prefer Tommy in the centres for the rest of the year. The problem is that since he did his hammy against Newcastle and came back for the away game against Cronulla, Snake has been pretty much woeful. I think Tom even on a bad ankle will offer more from fullback than Snake does right now.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
4 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
5 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
8 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
9 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
10 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -60 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |