Starlo to Titans?
- Thread starter stlth15
- Start date
manlyfan76
There is no A.I. Just better computers
Roosters want to keep Cordner.
Wombat Legacy
Bencher
Klemmer is a ****ing gronk-and he is a Bulldog
True Klemmer is currently a dog and Starlo was a Wabbit before we gave him the opportunity to wear our mighty maroon and white colours .
How often do you check the taste ?
Alby
Reserve Grader
What a dope
jols81
Member
Mate where would they fit in the top 17...What a dope
Josh Starling should have been a keeper.
A solid (yet unspectacular) player who is not on big money but can play a good hard game.
I hope our current management realise that we need these solid, cheaper players mixed in with the big name recruits.
It's nice to think we can afford millions on big name players but the reality is, every team needs their solid workhorses to plug the middle when the big names are off for a break.
Sorry to see you go Josh, if this does in fact happen.
A solid (yet unspectacular) player who is not on big money but can play a good hard game.
I hope our current management realise that we need these solid, cheaper players mixed in with the big name recruits.
It's nice to think we can afford millions on big name players but the reality is, every team needs their solid workhorses to plug the middle when the big names are off for a break.
Sorry to see you go Josh, if this does in fact happen.
Most would take a fit Buhrer for starters....
Though agree Starling is no superstar, has improved his numbers & gets the job done - a workhorse can serve a purpose - right??
As for exchange with ??? - this is more a 2017 deal & right now would be good to set up a strong 2016 squad, as injuries make or break a season without decent backup.
double hoops
First Grader
We're top 17 heavy, and will struggle when injuries happen. Its a list of 25 for a reason injuries are part of the game. The Roosters and Broncos roster never ends.
Loobs
Living in the demountable.
I think we have some decent young depth to pad out the 25. Most clubs don't have a BJ or Starlo at 18-25. Once you get into those guys it's usually youngsters. That's how say the Rooster got to using Napa and Hastings and so on.
Who are you picking in front of them ?
jols81
Member
Darcy lussick. lewis brown, liam knight,burgess mateo symonds... cant see them letting Lawrence go if starlo goes... plus Fonua blake if he can get registered...
tookey
First Grader
Have you or anyone else on this forum actually seen Fonua Blake play?
We have him as first grade standard yet he hasn't even played for over 12 months
Loobs
Living in the demountable.
Interesting - may be that the NRL has told them he can be registered so they need to ditch a prop to officially sign him.
double hoops
First Grader
@Loobs I agree that developing and having a spot for good young kids in the 25 is important. And all clubs have some kids. I guess what distinguishes top 4 teams from the almost rans is that depth in 18-25 and having NRL experienced forwards around those kids.
2015. Roosters. Lagi Setu, Suaia Matagi, Martin Kennedy. Cowboys -(with there 4 starting test props)still had Bolton , Glenn Hall. Broncos - Gavet, Todd Lowrie, David Stagg, Mitch Garbutt, Jon Green. Having Lawrence and Starling as depth in that 18-25 is probably where we need to be at just to compete.
Eagleman
Reserve Grader
Luke Burgess over Starling? That will do me. If you cant see the value in Starling over Burgess at least then its best you pop down to your local lobotomy clinic right now.
jols81
Member
Its about size....We need size to compete last time i checked he is 5 foot 6... he gets pushed around and cant break a tackle burgess can...
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
