Sorry for rambling in advance
Taupau is more important in other areas now than his power game, like being a reliable, cool-headed leader off the bench to stabilise games. I still really rate and respect taupau.
What I said before that bit you quoted was that "Taupau isn’t as explosive or confrontational as Aloiai atm"
To me, Aloiai and Paseka make the early inroads. Taupau comes on and is reliable, making some good runs but usually not really bending the line as much as he used to (fair enough, he's getting older). Sipley comes on alongside him to be the confrontational one that gets the momentum up the middle with fast surges and he struggles in the play the ball. Taupau, however, tends to kind of submit in the tackle at times. He still has moments where he has a powerful surge, but it is a little thinly spread at the moment to warrant starting imo.
Stats don't always tell the picture but they kind of hint to it. I was interested so gave it a real look (at least Des would be proud...)
- Taupau averages 47 post-contact metres per game, over an avg of 13.7 hitups. (still makes solid overall metres with 133m though).
- Aloiai averages 60 with the same amount of hitups a game
- Sipley averages 28 with just 5.8 hitups a game (which if extended to 13.7 hitups a game, would be 66 post-contact metres).
- Paseka averages 48, although with 3 less hitups (10.7 compared to 13.7). If extended to 13.7, his would be 61m
Although it is a little unfair to extrapolate Paseka and Sipley's stats it does kind of gauge the effectiveness of the average hitup of each player (in making post contact metres). For 1 hitup, Taupau averages 3.4 post contact metres, Paseka and Aloiai average 4.5m, whereas Sipley (relatively small sample) averages nearly 5m. It makes sense to start Paseka and Aloiai, then to bring on Taupau and Sipley.
He is still very, very valuable to the team. Was fired up against Tigers as he always is against them but want to see it more often again