Technical Coach
Bencher
To me it is simple, we all know that Politics, Religion and Sexuality are not required to ever be revealed be it in the workplace as a condition of employment or as a discussion full stop.
Education and laws that enable and promote inclusivity and protection is done at the Govt level and parenting. Corporations/businesses etc should never delve into such matters and risk cornering people to out their religious beliefs, sexuality or political persuasion in their place of employment.
If individuals want to promote a cause or bring together like minded people and use their celebrity status that is fine, clubs can ask players if they would like to promote “inclusivity” while representing the club like visiting schools etc which is also fine, this is still on an individual basis not grouping everyone to embrace a promotion.
This is not in my opinion about non acceptance of gays and lesbians, it is about over stepping the mark.
Dessie’s reply came across like it was carefully crafted written by lawyers and PR. I found the part about attaching the rainbow colours as meaning “inclusivity for all” a cleverly worded reply from lawyers, then linking this with an Autistic person story to broaden the definition and better suit the on the spot club narrative they wished to push to protect themselves.
Personally I don’t link gay,lesbian or bisexual as being any kind of sin, I accept the “born this way” science, no one would choose this sexuality beforehand knowing the struggles they would have to overcome. Transexuals I think shouldn’t be grouped with gays,lesbians and bisexuals under the same rainbow umbrella.
Just because I don’t feel comfortable around gay and bisexual men it doesn’t mean I don’t accept the “science” or would not respect them equally in the work place. I just choose not to befriend them and that is my choice, people call that discrimination so I just own it, I don’t really believe so
Education and laws that enable and promote inclusivity and protection is done at the Govt level and parenting. Corporations/businesses etc should never delve into such matters and risk cornering people to out their religious beliefs, sexuality or political persuasion in their place of employment.
If individuals want to promote a cause or bring together like minded people and use their celebrity status that is fine, clubs can ask players if they would like to promote “inclusivity” while representing the club like visiting schools etc which is also fine, this is still on an individual basis not grouping everyone to embrace a promotion.
This is not in my opinion about non acceptance of gays and lesbians, it is about over stepping the mark.
Dessie’s reply came across like it was carefully crafted written by lawyers and PR. I found the part about attaching the rainbow colours as meaning “inclusivity for all” a cleverly worded reply from lawyers, then linking this with an Autistic person story to broaden the definition and better suit the on the spot club narrative they wished to push to protect themselves.
Personally I don’t link gay,lesbian or bisexual as being any kind of sin, I accept the “born this way” science, no one would choose this sexuality beforehand knowing the struggles they would have to overcome. Transexuals I think shouldn’t be grouped with gays,lesbians and bisexuals under the same rainbow umbrella.
Just because I don’t feel comfortable around gay and bisexual men it doesn’t mean I don’t accept the “science” or would not respect them equally in the work place. I just choose not to befriend them and that is my choice, people call that discrimination so I just own it, I don’t really believe so