Weekend Results:
Brad Parker: 8
(alleged) Top-4 team, Paramatta: 6
In all seriousness though:
- Is Parker in isolation able to be improved on? Sure.
- Is Parker in this current TEAM structure able to be improved on? Debatable, and difficult to prove without assumptions that can be twisted to fit an anti-Parker narrative any day of the week.
You can scrutinise his flaws, and counter the 'but his Def is gud' argument with the times it hasn't been. You can assert he doesn't finish off tries that others would. That he is slow. You can suggest he doesn't have the flair and vision of more 'athletic' options at the position, or the 'upside' of more physical specimens. That we won't win a premiership with him. That he gets hit in the head too much and is a constant injury liability (which has strangely morphed into an asset the last 2 weeks..). It's all semantics and cherry-picking.
If you want to ignore the traits he brings to the team and suggest that we have better options then hey, go for it. Free forum. And i'll put it out there that he is in 1st Grade because he is the best option for the team right now, and plays his role without ego or expectation that it will just happen for him. He puts in the hard work.
Based on most recent performance that is undeniable as he was especially good over this weekend - I was there. He has been a key figure in our revival this year, after a couple of scratchy early games sure - but he has become one of the most improved and under-rated guys in the game today - and most importantly.....Des obviously agrees and retains him in the 1st grade team.
What better a way to give all those critics and doubters the fat middle finger they deserve, than performing? Those that don't like him will still find things he didn't do right in the game yesterday and leverage that to justify further criticism. Those same people will probably never approve of him even if he wins a Clive Churchill in a 41-0 win over Melbourne in a future grand-final.
Power to you Brad, keep the momentum and improvement going man.