Hastings before Brown IMO!
I was at that 2007 match, and the '08 match - both games showed the true feral 'aryan race' nature of the shire folkhttp://afltables.com/rl/teams/manly/manly_bv.html#21
Manly scores vs Sharks at Endeavour or whatever its called this week.
2016 lost 20-12
2015 won 14-12
2014 won 26-0
2013 n/a
2012 lost 17-14
2011 won 19-13
2010 won 48-18
2009 won 32-26
2008 won 34-6
2007 won 29-22
The above record is not bad.
But before that Manly's record after the mid 1980s was shocking. Thankfully Manly didn't play there every season.
2006 lost 15-12
2005 lost 68-6
2004 lost 28-20
2003 lost 40-16
1999 lost 32-4
1996 lost 12-10
1994 lost 26-14
1992 lost 28-8
1989 lost 19-14
1987 lost 18-13
1986 won 32-4
1985 lost 26-11
Including two each and every game.2016 - not enough halves
2017 - too many halves
he isn't needed and only gets a couple minutes each week if that.Why?
I think that is ok along as you don't lift your arm to promote the ballWill have to agree to disagree, he moved his arm out to promote the ball IMO, and I tipped the sharks hahaha
Saying Brown can cover centre is like saying Willo can cover coaching first grade.he isn't needed and only gets a couple minutes each week if that.
Brown can cover more positions ie center hooker and 2nd row. I'd prefer hastings over brown but it makes more sense why have hastings who barely plays when brown can cover more and sharks have a big pack this might just be a strategic move for this game alone.
I don't think Brown covers more positions at all. Hastings can cover halves, hooker, fullback and centres.he isn't needed and only gets a couple minutes each week if that.
Brown can cover more positions ie center hooker and 2nd row. I'd prefer hastings over brown but it makes more sense why have hastings who barely plays when brown can cover more and sharks have a big pack this might just be a strategic move for this game alone.
Hey Grassy....im a bit of a fan of the old plum brandy. ...any brands youd like to suggest ? Or do you prefer the backyard brew ?..... so its full on party time if we win, with some much needed plum brandy.I'll even try walking afterwards if i'm lucky.
It's made sense for the last 10 weeks but they persisted with both of them on the bench.And no way Sharks pack is bigger than the Raiders who they played only 2 games agohe isn't needed and only gets a couple minutes each week if that.
Brown can cover more positions ie center hooker and 2nd row. I'd prefer hastings over brown but it makes more sense why have hastings who barely plays when brown can cover more and sharks have a big pack this might just be a strategic move for this game alone.
Hastings still tackles a bit like a halfback, needs to improve that aspect to nail down a spot.I don't think Brown covers more positions at all. Hastings can cover halves, hooker, fullback and centres.
I think he's the type of player that worries the opposition and also worries his own team.lussick in the team worries me
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Broncos | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 56 | 8 |
4 | Raiders | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 8 |
5 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
6 | Warriors | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -20 | 8 |
7 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
8 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sharks | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -26 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -40 | 6 |
15 | Roosters | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -52 | 4 |
16 | Panthers | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -38 | 2 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |