Latrell Mitchell’s ban

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
  • Wwe are currently experience some server issues which I am working through and hoping to resolve soon, Please bare with me whilst I work through making some changes and possible intermittent outages.
  • Apologies all our server was runing rogue. I managed to get us back to a point from 2:45 today though there is an attachment issue i will fix shortly. Things should be smooth now though

EOL now nesting on the GC

Official NRL commentator of the UK Royal Family
Premium Member
Tipping Member
Yes it is that bad. Discuss his actions by all means but giving that as a name? Please no, it is clearly offensive and there's just no need for it. You're right that others have used it here in the past but I don't think we should, going forward. If you feel the need to use it then do it elsewhere, preferably under your own full name. Giving anyone such a disgusting moniker amounts to online abuse and when under the cloak of anonymity is frankly 'not very brave'.
So I ask everyone to please don't use it.
Come on.

Its a joke.

The guy is a an A@seh@le. A very good player but he has the biggest chip on his shoulder I've seen in 35 years of following this great game.

Our own players get more direct abuse week in week out from supposed manly fans and the word Latrine works some of you up that bad? Really?

I've been called a Di@khead of the highest order on here and while yes I did make me cry for 3 days I got over it...
 

wombatgc

KT 623
Premium Member
Tipping Member
I can still hear it today. Was at the game with a sharkies mate
I was at Jupiters casino when I watched that game. I remember clearly, as a work mate of mine who doubled as a bouncer at the casino, told me there were four Sharks blokes who had their eyes on me for a full blown retaliation. I quickly left thru a fire exit. Probably one of the smartest things I’ve done in my life. Thanks John.
 

grassy

Bencher
For the uneducated there is multiple different gradings. Not saying you are but this is as bad of a grading that we have seen all year. Most are graded careless, this is a grade 2 reckless which is way worse.

Gradings below:
Grade 1 Careless
Grade 2 Careless
Grade 3 Careless

Grade 1 reckless
Grade 2 reckless (Latrells charge)
Grade 3 reckless

Grade 1 intentional
Grade 2 intentional
Grade 3 intentional

Its extremely hard to prove something is intentional unless its Adrian Morley style. Any "intentional" charge would be sent straight to the judiciary, so when you consider the above information this is the 2nd worst charge he could have been graded with by the MRC.

To say a grade 2 reckless is lenient for this tackle is incorrect.
I wonder if they actually take into account what the victims face looks like at the end of the day AND how long he is out for.All the rest is just mind boggling politics.
 

Eagles4Life

Bencher
Premium Member
Tipping Member
Come on.

Its a joke.

The guy is a an A@seh@le. A very good player but he has the biggest chip on his shoulder I've seen in 35 years of following this great game.

Our own players get more direct abuse week in week out from supposed manly fans and the word Latrine works some of you up that bad? Really?

I've been called a Di@khead of the highest order on here and while yes I did make me cry for 3 days I got over it...
images (2).jpeg

Toilet humour has no place on this site. It demeans us all @Eagle of London 🤔
 
Come on.

Its a joke.

The guy is a an A@seh@le. A very good player but he has the biggest chip on his shoulder I've seen in 35 years of following this great game.

Our own players get more direct abuse week in week out from supposed manly fans and the word Latrine works some of you up that bad? Really?

I've been called a Di@khead of the highest order on here and while yes I did make me cry for 3 days I got over it...
ruok now though :wondering:
 

AlxFromNthNarra

Rarely does big posts worth reading....maybe
CNH's hit on Hughes was around the upper-chest/throat area. That's pretty bad, I admit. He copped a fair suspension, and he seemed to agree it was warranted.

Latrell's shoulder was flush on the face of Manu. I can't describe that any way than.... 'it's much, much worse'. And Latrell stayed on the field, Manu had to shirt-front him to get attention to it, and even after that - with Manu's face puffing up like a marshmallow, Latrell still looks defiant, victimised, 'wtf are you talking about'....

The slow-mo clearly shows Latrell - after the hit has landed - swinging his arm where Manu's head WOULD have been if he hadn't just caved in his face and sent him base-over-apex into the turf.

I just don't know what other way to say this - he went in with with massive intent. From halfway across the field, he lined the guy up and went for an impact hit that would be remembered.

Gould and Gallen and Co. say that Latrell went into this tackle to 'assert his authority', that 'it's not his go', but there are 2 things here - he either got it VERY wrong, or they are simply wrong, and Latrell went into cause as much dmg as possible in an attempt to 'assert authority', and he got it wrong. Regardless, he intended dmg and it happened, or he didn't intend dmg, and it happened.

Perhaps he got it right, completely as intended, against a player he used to play with train with, and knows how good he is - regardless, both outcomes should carry the most serious of penalties, as there is no way that the 'victim' of this ends up in a way that adheres to PVL's purported 'protecting the players' stance...

On talent, Latrell is a superstar. He is a massive drawcard. He is one of a handful of players you can compare in raw ability to our own beloved Turbo (even if Turbo doesn't need to be a POS to stamp his authority).

However.......Latrell is also an absolute C*nt. A bad sportsman. Throwing the ball - at point blank, when he's on the ground lamenting an opposition try - in the face of his ex-team-mate after he scores a try he should never have been given the opportunity to score, just proves his quality. The guy is simply an asshole. He loves the confrontation. He itches for it.

Simply put, If Latrell plays again this year, the rules are guidelines, PVL is full of ****, and the NRL is about protecting marketability - not protecting players. Latrell showed no remorse, no contrition - he went in and pegged the ball at his ex-team-mates head at point-blank as he felt hard done by. Victimised. It wasn't because he did anything, its because he's 'Latrell Mitchell' the self-declared best player in the league, that tall-poppy hunters are out to get. The only thing Mitchell need to get is over himself.

Watching Flegler get 10mins tonight, can you really say there is any comparison? Result was the same on the game - but Flegler's hit is not going to end some poor guy's season...it was not a long-distance, lined-up, calculated Dog-shot. Flegler was loose no doubt, and will pay the penalty, Jack Williams will live to fight another day - he is not in hospital calculating if his face will look different for the rest of his life. Thanks to an ex Team-mate landing that shot on him.

Do the right thing NRL. Ignore all the 'indicators' of bias-based concern - it isn't because he has indigenous heritage. It isn't because he is playing for a top-4 side. It isn't because a specific referee at a specific time, in a specific place decided to give Latrell exceptional treatment. He just did the dog-act of the season, won't accept that is the truth of it, and as a result won't show any remorse. He deserves to be rubbed out for the remainder of the year.

And as surprising as this might sound - I actually enjoy watching a prodigious talent like Latrell strutting his stuff. Totally self-inflicted, and needs to be made an example of - as it's not isolated. Precedent exists.
 
Last edited:
It isn't though - this hit from CHN on Hughes at 3:45 was charged as a Grade 3 Reckless three weeks ago and Latrell's hit on Manu is at least as bad as it.

CWH was worse and bordering on intentional. Latrell was in cover defence. Its a little different to CWH Sprinting off his line and taking Hughes' head off.
If you look how low Manu is at point of contact I would say his charge fits his offence.
 

Eagles4Life

Bencher
Premium Member
Tipping Member
CNH's hit on Hughes was around the upper-chest/throat area. That's pretty bad, I admit. He copped a fair suspension, and he seemed to agree it was warranted.

Latrell's shoulder was flush on the face of Manu. I can't describe that any way than.... 'it's much, much worse'. And Latrell stayed on the field, Manu had to shirt-front him to get attention to it, and even after that - with Manu's face puffing up like a marshmallow, Latrell still looks defiant, victimised, 'wtf are you talking about'....

The slow-mo clearly shows Latrell - after the hit has landed - swinging his arm where Manu's head WOULD have been if he hadn't just caved in his face and sent him base-over-apex into the turf.

I just don't know what other way to say this - he went in with with massive intent. From halfway across the field, he lined the guy up and went for an impact hit that would be remembered.

Gould and Gallen and Co. say that Latrell went into this tackle to 'assert his authority', that 'it's not his go', but there are 2 things here - he either got it VERY wrong, or they are simply wrong, and Latrell went into cause as much dmg as possible in an attempt to 'assert authority', and he got it wrong. Regardless, he intended dmg and it happened, or he didn't intend dmg, and it happened.

Perhaps he got it right, completely as intended, against a player he used to play with train with, and knows how good he is - regardless, both outcomes should carry the most serious of penalties, as there is no way that the 'victim' of this ends up in a way that adheres to PVL's purported 'protecting the players' stance...

On talent, Latrell is a superstar. He is a massive drawcard. He is one of a handful of players you can compare in raw ability to our own beloved Turbo (even if Turbo doesn't need to be a POS to stamp his authority).

However.......Latrell is also an absolute C*nt. A bad sportsman. Throwing the ball - at point blank, when he's on the ground lamenting an opposition try - in the face of his ex-team-mate after he scores a try he should never have been given the opportunity to score just proves his quality. The guy is simply an asshole. He loves the confrontation. He itches for it.

Simply put, If Latrell plays again this year, the rules are guidelines, PVL is full of ****, and the NRL is about protecting marketability - not protecting players. Latrell showed no remorse, no contrition - he went in and pegged the ball at his ex-team-mates head at point-blank as he felt hard done by. Victimised. It wasn't because he did anything, its because he's 'Latrell Mitchell' the self-declared best player in the league, that tall-poppy hunters are out to get. The only thing Mitchell need to get is over himself.

Watching Flegler get 10mins tonight, can you really say there is any comparison? Result was the same on the game - but Flegler's hit is not going to end some poor guy's season...it was not a long-distance, lined-up, calculated Dog-shot. Flegler was loose no doubt, and will pay the penalty, Jack Williams will live to fight another day - he is not in hospital calculating if his face will look different for the rest of his life. Thanks to an ex Team-mate landing that shot on him.

Do the right thing NRL. Ignore all the 'indicators' of bias-based concern - it isn't because he has indigenous heritage. It isn't because he is playing for a top-4 side. It isn't because a specific referee at a specific time, in a specific place decided to give Latrell exceptional treatment. He just did the dog-act of the season, won't accept that is the truth of it, and as a result won't show any remorse. He deserves to be rubbed out for the remainder of the year.

And as surprising as this might sound - I actually enjoy watching a prodigious talent like Latrell strutting his stuff. Totally self-inflicted, and needs to be made an example of - as it's not isolated. Precedent exists.
You win this thread mate @AlxFromNthNarra Fantastic, well written and beautifully argued post.
👏👏👏
 

nightster

The older I get the better I was
Premium Member
Tipping Member
CWH was worse and bordering on intentional. Latrell was in cover defence. Its a little different to CWH Sprinting off his line and taking Hughes' head off.
If you look how low Manu is at point of contact I would say his charge fits his offence.
I agree with you most of the time Robbo but not this time - Reckless grade 3 and worse than The CHN tackle imho
 
I agree with you most of the time Robbo but not this time - Reckless grade 3 and worse than The CHN tackle imho
This is it. Its just our opinions. They were both brutal tackles and both punished badly and won't play again this season. Id say just was served on both occasions even though a slightly different grading.

I think Latrell gets unfairly targeted on here because people don't like him. If it was Klokstad or Turbo or even a Pappenhuyzen, I think people would be more lenient on them. That's just my opinion anyway.
 
CNH's hit on Hughes was around the upper-chest/throat area. That's pretty bad, I admit. He copped a fair suspension, and he seemed to agree it was warranted.

Latrell's shoulder was flush on the face of Manu. I can't describe that any way than.... 'it's much, much worse'. And Latrell stayed on the field, Manu had to shirt-front him to get attention to it, and even after that - with Manu's face puffing up like a marshmallow, Latrell still looks defiant, victimised, 'wtf are you talking about'....

The slow-mo clearly shows Latrell - after the hit has landed - swinging his arm where Manu's head WOULD have been if he hadn't just caved in his face and sent him base-over-apex into the turf.

I just don't know what other way to say this - he went in with with massive intent. From halfway across the field, he lined the guy up and went for an impact hit that would be remembered.

Gould and Gallen and Co. say that Latrell went into this tackle to 'assert his authority', that 'it's not his go', but there are 2 things here - he either got it VERY wrong, or they are simply wrong, and Latrell went into cause as much dmg as possible in an attempt to 'assert authority', and he got it wrong. Regardless, he intended dmg and it happened, or he didn't intend dmg, and it happened.

Perhaps he got it right, completely as intended, against a player he used to play with train with, and knows how good he is - regardless, both outcomes should carry the most serious of penalties, as there is no way that the 'victim' of this ends up in a way that adheres to PVL's purported 'protecting the players' stance...

On talent, Latrell is a superstar. He is a massive drawcard. He is one of a handful of players you can compare in raw ability to our own beloved Turbo (even if Turbo doesn't need to be a POS to stamp his authority).

However.......Latrell is also an absolute C*nt. A bad sportsman. Throwing the ball - at point blank, when he's on the ground lamenting an opposition try - in the face of his ex-team-mate after he scores a try he should never have been given the opportunity to score, just proves his quality. The guy is simply an asshole. He loves the confrontation. He itches for it.

Simply put, If Latrell plays again this year, the rules are guidelines, PVL is full of ****, and the NRL is about protecting marketability - not protecting players. Latrell showed no remorse, no contrition - he went in and pegged the ball at his ex-team-mates head at point-blank as he felt hard done by. Victimised. It wasn't because he did anything, its because he's 'Latrell Mitchell' the self-declared best player in the league, that tall-poppy hunters are out to get. The only thing Mitchell need to get is over himself.

Watching Flegler get 10mins tonight, can you really say there is any comparison? Result was the same on the game - but Flegler's hit is not going to end some poor guy's season...it was not a long-distance, lined-up, calculated Dog-shot. Flegler was loose no doubt, and will pay the penalty, Jack Williams will live to fight another day - he is not in hospital calculating if his face will look different for the rest of his life. Thanks to an ex Team-mate landing that shot on him.

Do the right thing NRL. Ignore all the 'indicators' of bias-based concern - it isn't because he has indigenous heritage. It isn't because he is playing for a top-4 side. It isn't because a specific referee at a specific time, in a specific place decided to give Latrell exceptional treatment. He just did the dog-act of the season, won't accept that is the truth of it, and as a result won't show any remorse. He deserves to be rubbed out for the remainder of the year.

And as surprising as this might sound - I actually enjoy watching a prodigious talent like Latrell strutting his stuff. Totally self-inflicted, and needs to be made an example of - as it's not isolated. Precedent exists.
Funny spot to have a neck ;) They were both brutal shots! Its just an opinion which one was worse. They were as bad as each other!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210828-194911_Google.jpg
    Screenshot_20210828-194911_Google.jpg
    127 KB · Views: 4

Staff online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
14 11 3 103 26
14 10 4 118 24
14 10 4 78 24
15 9 6 161 20
14 8 6 60 20
14 7 7 63 18
14 7 7 37 18
15 8 7 -8 18
14 7 7 -50 18
13 7 6 -55 18
15 7 7 28 17
14 6 8 -55 16
15 6 8 -47 15
14 5 9 -112 14
14 4 10 -71 12
14 4 10 -121 12
13 3 10 -129 10
Back
Top Bottom