Kelma Tuilagi

Also, the previous 4 weeks, he's been HEAPS better than normal:

151 metres
105 metres
119 metres
73 metres

So he CAN do it.
 
Also, the previous 4 weeks, he's been HEAPS better than normal:

151 metres
105 metres
119 metres
73 metres

So he CAN do it.

I like to see them do it when the chips are down and you cant win.

No one ever told Watmough or Gifty they needed to have a go. Not that he should be compared to them, but Lawton and Davey are of the same ilk.

I am happy to put it down to a bad team performance last night but it would of been nice if he had shown some fight like Naden, Laurie and Garner.
 
I hope he backflips. I don’t rate him. He is solid and capable of playing the odd decent game but Manly need to rethink their recruitment. We’ve got such a **** forward pack. We don’t need anymore inconsistent impact style players.

We need hard working competitors to drive standards. We are the laziest team. Our pack is immobile and slow. I never thought I’d say this, but Davey is a better option.
 
I hope he backflips. I don’t rate him. He is solid and capable of playing the odd decent game but Manly need to rethink their recruitment. We’ve got such a **** forward pack. We don’t need anymore inconsistent impact style players.

We need hard working competitors to drive standards. We are the laziest team. Our pack is immobile and slow. I never thought I’d say this, but Davey is a better option.
I agree that that stylistically there are better fits
 
I hope he backflips. I don’t rate him. He is solid and capable of playing the odd decent game but Manly need to rethink their recruitment. We’ve got such a **** forward pack. We don’t need anymore inconsistent impact style players.

We need hard working competitors to drive standards. We are the laziest team. Our pack is immobile and slow. I never thought I’d say this, but Davey is a better option.
Curious what mould of players/ forwards people may think we require?
(Not having a crack - just genuinely curious)...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
1 1 0 36 2
1 1 0 30 2
1 1 0 22 2
1 1 0 8 2
1 1 0 6 2
1 1 0 2 2
1 1 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -6 0
1 0 1 -8 0
1 0 1 -22 0
1 0 1 -30 0
1 0 1 -36 0
Back
Top Bottom