TimmyQ
Bencher
Ken Maumalo pls.He's be great, but no matter who we got/get, everyone would complain.
Now, we need a speedy winger, and another blue chip forward, and we have a complete set.
Ken Maumalo pls.He's be great, but no matter who we got/get, everyone would complain.
Now, we need a speedy winger, and another blue chip forward, and we have a complete set.
I didn’t say they had been changed but I heard a rumour the Penn’s have applied for a loan and Zorba was seen checking out the prices at ColesWhen did the urinal cakes get changed?
And unless Manly get what they covet of the Titans,all that glorious history will be just that,history.Manlys issues are not on field because most clubs have down turn in their performance at some stageThe Titans have many of the advantages to be successful, yet they are not. They have what Manly covets:
* a purpose-built stadium and excellent training facilities
* the backing of the NRL who are desperate to see them succeed
* the ability to buy 'stars'
* a vast catchment area for talented juniors
What they share with Manly is:
* private single ownership, which has proven unsuccessful
* an ideal lifestyle, which is a plus when trying to recruit players
* relatively small sponsorships and TPAs
* a lot of off-field issues and controversies
What they lack, and which Manly has, is:
* a rusted-on fan base (because of the transient nature of residents in their catchment region)
* a glorious history and a (once) strong culture
* tribalism
* a (once) strong 'brand'
In regards to coaches,havnt they had to sack their last 2 (and likely another one if they don't perform over the nxt 2 years lol)Titans have had the same amount of coaches as Manly in the last 10 years,they have a modern stadium and modern training facilities,they’re financially sound and a refurb of their stadium isn’t just a change of the urinal cakes like Brookvale Oval.Not saying the Titans are the envy of the competition but they’re certainly in a much better place than Manly currently
.Manlys issues are not on field
Plus Manly has 853 more members than them.The Titans have many of the advantages to be successful, yet they are not. They have what Manly covets:
* a purpose-built stadium and excellent training facilities
* the backing of the NRL who are desperate to see them succeed
* the ability to buy 'stars'
* a vast catchment area for talented juniors
What they share with Manly is:
* private single ownership, which has proven unsuccessful
* an ideal lifestyle, which is a plus when trying to recruit players
* relatively small sponsorships and TPAs
* a lot of off-field issues and controversies
What they lack, and which Manly has, is:
* a rusted-on fan base (because of the transient nature of residents in their catchment region)
* a glorious history and a (once) strong culture
* tribalism
* a (once) strong 'brand'
It tells you how far the club has fallen when we’re talking about Elgey as an option.He may improve with the right tutelage but there were many saying Barrett would take DCE to a higher levelAt the core.
I'm underwhelmed at the thought of having Elgey. If you look up meh in a dictionary there is a pic of him. Meh.
Plus Manly has 853 more members than them.
Maybe that was why Barrett was crying the other day?When did the urinal cakes get changed?
About time they changed them. They tasted like piss.When did the urinal cakes get changed?
Their loan was declined as they couldn't meet the new living expenses requirementsI didn’t say they had been changed but I heard a rumour the Penn’s have applied for a loan and Zorba was seen checking out the prices at Coles
I think Kane might go well beside DCE.
I don’t see why we constantly go after the Titan’s cast offs - Nate Myles and now Elgey?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |