manly al
First Grader
Take your point of some reluctance with starting with Humphries but think the main reasoning with having Brooks and Talau in the halfs was more to aim up against Wighton [ a big unit ] and the experienced Walker.Plenty of Humphreys hysteria since his non-selection on saturday but I've no doubt he'll be in first grade deputising for DCE anytime he's unavailable for the rest of this year.
The circumstances of Saturday were that our forwards were decimated, not our backs.
Not selecting another debutant was more likely due to us having no confidence in the threadbare pack.
A more adventurous move would have been to chuck Jamie in as well, but a debutant halfback whose pack is going backwards is obviously a potential embarrassment. In hindsight the wrong call, yeah maybe, but not an irrational one.
Good luck to him at Souths, and in any Manly games this year.
you forgot to add, and sign Bennett
Should really have been a rational move then to have Humphries on the bench to cover this arrangement not quite working out .
Then not bringing Bully on until the or around the 28 min in the first half i think [ which had to be a major mis step ] and hardly indicating that Seibold was overly concerned about and for whatever reason , with the run on forward line up .
On that reasoning then , really should not have been a problem going with say , Bully , Condon , Navale and Humphries on the bench .
Anyway all hindsight now but Manly now struggling again on the points table and quite a few dubious calls to say the least