Jamal Fogarty

"For non yardage situations, Fogarty takes top spot at 29.5% of sets that end with one of his actions."

"Using this same approach allows us to identify players who are responsible for controlling field position like Ilias and Jack Cogger, isolate the halves who are primarily creating attacking chances like Cameron Munster and Lachlan Galvin, and identify those who do both (Jamal Fogarty, Nathan Cleary, Daly Cherry-Evans)."

 
"For non yardage situations, Fogarty takes top spot at 29.5% of sets that end with one of his actions."

"Using this same approach allows us to identify players who are responsible for controlling field position like Ilias and Jack Cogger, isolate the halves who are primarily creating attacking chances like Cameron Munster and Lachlan Galvin, and identify those who do both (Jamal Fogarty, Nathan Cleary, Daly Cherry-Evans)."

Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

1000049460.webp

We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
 
Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

View attachment 30766
We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
I guess those stats also support why the Dogs are moving Sexton on, though Galvin doesn’t appear to be much of an improvement (admittedly based largely on tigers stats).
 
Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

View attachment 30766
We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
He’s a good replacement but I have the dollar chaser ahead of him as ‘value added’ to a side. Just an opinion of course. I know DCE has shortcoming with overplaying his hand at times but I think he’s one of the elite creative halfbacks in the game. The Raiders attack is nothing special and so much of it is off the forward pack’s damage. It’s like they bash the door down to score points. I hope Fog’s contributions are equally effective with an inferior pack.

I trust that his kicking game will hold up but worry that he might feel pressure at times (from fans and critics) when our attack is less potent.
 
Speaking of players from Canberra who are moving on/have moved on...
Wonder how Wighton is feeling? He left Canberra chasing a premiership, and to be with his mates Latrene and Cody. Chances are he'll end up with a piece of woodenware rather than silverware. Must go down as the dumbest move in recent memory; even dumber than Lomax foregoing a big chunk of salary to play for Doesn'tmatta.
 
Speaking of players from Canberra who are moving on/have moved on...
Wonder how Wighton is feeling? He left Canberra chasing a premiership, and to be with his mates Latrene and Cody. Chances are he'll end up with a piece of woodenware rather than silverware. Must go down as the dumbest move in recent memory; even dumber than Lomax foregoing a big chunk of salary to play for Doesn'tmatta.
Wighton dropped a couple of hundred grand also in his George Costanza deal with Souths
 
I see Fogarty as more of an Adam Reynolds type half ... a controller and steerer more than an adlib player... I'm really looking forward to seeing what the change will bring after so many years of D$E's style
That’s what is exciting about it. We’ve seen the last few weeks what a bit of control has done for the side. We’ve shown a willingness to get into the grind, complete sets and kick to corners and it’s worked. At least we know Fog will endorse a similar approach.
 
He’s a good replacement but I have the dollar chaser ahead of him as ‘value added’ to a side. Just an opinion of course. I know DCE has shortcoming with overplaying his hand at times but I think he’s one of the elite creative halfbacks in the game. The Raiders attack is nothing special and so much of it is off the forward pack’s damage. It’s like they bash the door down to score points. I hope Fog’s contributions are equally effective with an inferior pack.

I trust that his kicking game will hold up but worry that he might feel pressure at times (from fans and critics) when our attack is less potent.
That’s an excellent analysis …fogs has the luxury of playing behind the best pack in the comp
 
That’s what is exciting about it. We’ve seen the last few weeks what a bit of control has done for the side. We’ve shown a willingness to get into the grind, complete sets and kick to corners and it’s worked. At least we know Fog will endorse a similar approach.
IMO The Fog is better suited to what we need. DCE is the type of player to ice the winning play in a final, but he isn't the type to carry us to the finals.

A good inverse example would be the Sharks in recent years. A powerful team that lacks the killer mentality. They can make the finals often, but don't do much in them. DCE would've been a perfect fit for them, and would've given them the extra level. This may be why Gould acquired Galvin now, to prevent the Dogs coming to the same fate.

In my opinion, we are the exact opposite of the Sharks. We make the finals on an extremely inconsistent basis, due to our razzle-dazzle risky style, but when we do make them, we can knock over anyone.

We have enough ball-playing and X-factor without DCE, but we lack the power and grit to get to a GF. Fogarty adds a bit of control and grit. He's willing to stay in the grind, and get us wins, rather than keep going for hero plays. He's the type to bring us to finals, but it's on Turbo, Hoppa, Brooks and Walsh, to ice those finals.

I think both parties will be better off without each other, after long consideration. This is the silver lining.
 
IMO The Fog is better suited to what we need. DCE is the type of player to ice the winning play in a final, but he isn't the type to carry us to the finals.

A good inverse example would be the Sharks in recent years. A powerful team that lacks the killer mentality. They can make the finals often, but don't do much in them. DCE would've been a perfect fit for them, and would've given them the extra level. This may be why Gould acquired Galvin now, to prevent the Dogs coming to the same fate.

In my opinion, we are the exact opposite of the Sharks. We make the finals on an extremely inconsistent basis, due to our razzle-dazzle risky style, but when we do make them, we can knock over anyone.

We have enough ball-playing and X-factor without DCE, but we lack the power and grit to get to a GF. Fogarty adds a bit of control and grit. He's willing to stay in the grind, and get us wins, rather than keep going for hero plays. He's the type to bring us to finals, but it's on Turbo, Hoppa, Brooks and Walsh, to ice those finals.

I think both parties will be better off without each other, after long consideration. This is the silver lining.
There’s a lot of sense to this and I think it could totally be the case; I just hope it is 😎
 
Paying cherry a motza and still having to recruit the missing pieces has always been the problem . Not because of what he brings but for what he doesnt . Its not new and is huge to all team success the balance of skills and smarts

Needing another million dollar half to play next to him so he can pick and choose and showcase, is part of the package . Tom probably extended his years by shortening his own as he has just followed him with his fancy pants on

a lot of reinventing the wheel this season from the DCE fan Zone. For some it seems his footy gained scrutiny with his announcement, not his form. Gaining clarity from butthurt
 
a lot of reinventing the wheel this season from the DCE fan Zone. For some it seems his footy gained scrutiny with his announcement, not his form. Gaining clarity from butthurt
My view of the quality of DCE's playing has not really changed since his channel 9 appearance.
More the case that you can forgive someone for being below immortal status, and just about everything else, when they are all in with the club, doing whatever they can.
But when it's suddenly announced that no, he wants to play on anywhere but Manly .... just piss off then!
Having said that, I think there was a period where his form was probably affected by that back spasm episode - when you've had them, there's a mental element and some fear about when they might come back.
Hopefully fully fit again now and can play his best footy (which is bloody good) for another couple of months.
Then piss off! @:D
 
Good outcome for us
My view of the quality of DCE's playing has not really changed since his channel 9 appearance.
More the case that you can forgive someone for being below immortal status, and just about everything else, when they are all in with the club, doing whatever they can.
But when it's suddenly announced that no, he wants to play on anywhere but Manly .... just piss off then!
Having said that, I think there was a period where his form was probably affected by that back spasm episode - when you've had them, there's a mental element and some fear about when they might come back.
Hopefully fully fit again now and can play his best footy (which is bloody good) for another couple of months.
Then piss off! @:D
I see a change. At one stage he let a large forward run right past him to score next to the posts shortly after the announcement. Last week he put his body on the line and made a try saving tackle on big Solomona.
 
My view of the quality of DCE's playing has not really changed since his channel 9 appearance.
More the case that you can forgive someone for being below immortal status, and just about everything else, when they are all in with the club, doing whatever they can.
But when it's suddenly announced that no, he wants to play on anywhere but Manly .... just piss off then!
Having said that, I think there was a period where his form was probably affected by that back spasm episode - when you've had them, there's a mental element and some fear about when they might come back.
Hopefully fully fit again now and can play his best footy (which is bloody good) for another couple of months.
Then piss off! @:D
the dce manly bromance should have ended after the big 8 years
Been living off past deeds and we are in the box seat to see it. Blind eye seems to be what you are explaining
Do you know how often the MOM in 2011 GF comes up , well not lately , i had hair back then FFS ,
Next year 42% of the forum find out they have to cast 3 votes for the MVP , not just DCE and 2 other randoms
 
Next year 42% of the forum find out they have to cast 3 votes for the MVP , not just DCE and 2 other randoms
Not really. We can just substitute the Fog.

Meanwhile .. against those dastardly Dogs ... please give us a couple of your sublime passes to set Saab & Co into clear space 🙂
 
There was an interesting interview (can not find it which is a shame) with our next coach i.e. Kieran Foran where he was saying that the game has now moved on from organising halves where you would work towards a set of 6 etc and that they should now play whats in front of them

I think this is the approach that Melbourne have taken with 3 full backs and Harry Grant doing most of the "7" work. I can also see it going that way for the dogs
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 18 15 0 3 132 34
2 Bulldogs 17 13 0 4 98 32
3 Storm 17 12 0 5 218 30
4 Warriors 17 12 0 5 36 30
5 Broncos 17 10 0 7 80 26
6 Panthers 17 9 1 7 45 25
7 Sea Eagles 17 9 0 8 60 24
8 Sharks 18 10 0 8 21 24
9 Dolphins 18 9 0 9 169 22
10 Roosters 17 8 0 9 8 22
11 Dragons 17 6 0 11 -58 18
12 Tigers 18 7 0 11 -101 18
13 Cowboys 18 6 1 11 -163 17
14 Knights 18 6 0 12 -90 16
15 Eels 17 5 0 12 -149 16
16 Rabbitohs 18 6 0 12 -149 16
17 Titans 17 4 0 13 -157 14
Back
Top Bottom