Jamal Fogarty

"For non yardage situations, Fogarty takes top spot at 29.5% of sets that end with one of his actions."

"Using this same approach allows us to identify players who are responsible for controlling field position like Ilias and Jack Cogger, isolate the halves who are primarily creating attacking chances like Cameron Munster and Lachlan Galvin, and identify those who do both (Jamal Fogarty, Nathan Cleary, Daly Cherry-Evans)."

 
"For non yardage situations, Fogarty takes top spot at 29.5% of sets that end with one of his actions."

"Using this same approach allows us to identify players who are responsible for controlling field position like Ilias and Jack Cogger, isolate the halves who are primarily creating attacking chances like Cameron Munster and Lachlan Galvin, and identify those who do both (Jamal Fogarty, Nathan Cleary, Daly Cherry-Evans)."

Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

1000049460.webp

We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
 
Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

View attachment 30766
We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
I guess those stats also support why the Dogs are moving Sexton on, though Galvin doesn’t appear to be much of an improvement (admittedly based largely on tigers stats).
 
Here's a more up to date version of that non-yardage utilisation rate:

View attachment 30766
We could not have signed a better replacement for DCE. I'm kicking myself... DCE said no to us, and we ended up with a cheaper, arguably better halfback, from the team running first. Insanely good acquisition.
He’s a good replacement but I have the dollar chaser ahead of him as ‘value added’ to a side. Just an opinion of course. I know DCE has shortcoming with overplaying his hand at times but I think he’s one of the elite creative halfbacks in the game. The Raiders attack is nothing special and so much of it is off the forward pack’s damage. It’s like they bash the door down to score points. I hope Fog’s contributions are equally effective with an inferior pack.

I trust that his kicking game will hold up but worry that he might feel pressure at times (from fans and critics) when our attack is less potent.
 
Speaking of players from Canberra who are moving on/have moved on...
Wonder how Wighton is feeling? He left Canberra chasing a premiership, and to be with his mates Latrene and Cody. Chances are he'll end up with a piece of woodenware rather than silverware. Must go down as the dumbest move in recent memory; even dumber than Lomax foregoing a big chunk of salary to play for Doesn'tmatta.
 
Speaking of players from Canberra who are moving on/have moved on...
Wonder how Wighton is feeling? He left Canberra chasing a premiership, and to be with his mates Latrene and Cody. Chances are he'll end up with a piece of woodenware rather than silverware. Must go down as the dumbest move in recent memory; even dumber than Lomax foregoing a big chunk of salary to play for Doesn'tmatta.
Wighton dropped a couple of hundred grand also in his George Costanza deal with Souths
 
I see Fogarty as more of an Adam Reynolds type half ... a controller and steerer more than an adlib player... I'm really looking forward to seeing what the change will bring after so many years of D$E's style
That’s what is exciting about it. We’ve seen the last few weeks what a bit of control has done for the side. We’ve shown a willingness to get into the grind, complete sets and kick to corners and it’s worked. At least we know Fog will endorse a similar approach.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 18 15 0 3 132 34
2 Bulldogs 17 13 0 4 98 32
3 Storm 17 12 0 5 218 30
4 Warriors 17 12 0 5 36 30
5 Broncos 17 10 0 7 80 26
6 Panthers 17 9 1 7 45 25
7 Sea Eagles 17 9 0 8 60 24
8 Sharks 18 10 0 8 21 24
9 Dolphins 18 9 0 9 169 22
10 Roosters 17 8 0 9 8 22
11 Dragons 17 6 0 11 -58 18
12 Tigers 18 7 0 11 -101 18
13 Cowboys 18 6 1 11 -163 17
14 Knights 18 6 0 12 -90 16
15 Eels 17 5 0 12 -149 16
16 Rabbitohs 18 6 0 12 -149 16
17 Titans 17 4 0 13 -157 14
Back
Top Bottom