As a combination how long do you think DCE and LG .... will be ahead of say Cust and Croker ?? .... one, two years .. always ...?
It appears that DCE/Croker may be THE combination in the short term and expect Cust will jump Egley to battle Croker as DCE's partner in the not too distant future.
Hey hey I'm baaaackk!! After entering my 2nd year of University, I have realised I just don't have enough people to talk about Manly to
Welcome back Ella, we have missed your reporting.Hey hey I'm baaaackk!! After entering my 2nd year of University, I have realised I just don't have enough people to talk about Manly to
Anyways, something I am really interested to know is who you would pick as our starting backs once we have a fully fit side again? I have been reaaally struggling to pick out of Tommy, Garrick, Elliott, Taufua, Suli, Parker, Walker, Chez, Cust, Croker and Elgey.
I see 1, 5 and 7 confirmed as Tommy, Garrick and Chez, respectively. However, I really don't know who will get the remaining spots.
If you follow me on Twitter, you would know I am not exactly thrilled that Walker was found not guilty after all the damning evidence that was released to the public... So I personally would rather see Suli and Parker as our centres, but I know that is not likely to be the case for everyone else. To partner Chez, I don't think him and Elgey had the best combination, and I believe Elgey shines way more at halfback, which he would have to give up. Cust had an amazing debut, but I also think Croker deserves a shot, so I am very undecided. And Elliott has improved out of sight, but Taufua has been solid in defence too.... I just can't pick!
So, who fills up your spots???
1. Tommy
2. ??
3. ??
4. ??
5. Garrick
6. ??
7. Chez
Welcome back champion!Hey hey I'm baaaackk!! After entering my 2nd year of University, I have realised I just don't have enough people to talk about Manly to
Anyways, something I am really interested to know is who you would pick as our starting backs once we have a fully fit side again? I have been reaaally struggling to pick out of Tommy, Garrick, Elliott, Taufua, Suli, Parker, Walker, Chez, Cust, Croker and Elgey.
I see 1, 5 and 7 confirmed as Tommy, Garrick and Chez, respectively. However, I really don't know who will get the remaining spots.
If you follow me on Twitter, you would know I am not exactly thrilled that Walker was found not guilty after all the damning evidence that was released to the public... So I personally would rather see Suli and Parker as our centres, but I know that is not likely to be the case for everyone else. To partner Chez, I don't think him and Elgey had the best combination, and I believe Elgey shines way more at halfback, which he would have to give up. Cust had an amazing debut, but I also think Croker deserves a shot, so I am very undecided. And Elliott has improved out of sight, but Taufua has been solid in defence too.... I just can't pick!
So, who fills up your spots???
1. Tommy
2. ??
3. ??
4. ??
5. Garrick
6. ??
7. Chez
1.Turbo
2.Taufua
3.Walker
4.Parker
5.Garrick
6.Cust
7.Cherry Evans
Elliot is great at fb but yea i agree taufua has been great the last 6 games hes cut out his errors to basically 0 and his runs out of our own half are some of the toughest... elliot couldn't do that hed get rag dolled. Its like making ponga take hit ups on our own line but without the stepJorge is going awesome... so many tough metres out of our own end, great finisher, seasoned campaigner. Why would you drop him? Elliot is playing FB atm not wing. we truly live in an age of highlight reels and instant gratification... thank fark our coach is still analogue.
I knew dessie would make this kid great, barrett played him on the wing when hes clearly a good center. Ah barrett his stain is speedily fadingParker has been awesome and is very much a Des style player. He can lock down the centre spot long term.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |