First coach sacked.

Doubt Siebs will be sacked after last years result and extension. I would have locked in Payten, but he seems to have turned it around somewhat. O’Brien is on the list for sure. Don’t think there are many others on the list tbh.
 
My money on O'Brien but Seibold is rapidly heading for 2nd favourite.
OBrien has a 46% Win record and Seibold has a Win 49% record
3% Between them . We are splitting hairs here
This is a forum where we pour our Manly Hearts out
I find both these blokes very Underwhelming
I dont see any of them making a mark as a Marquee coach
 
Doubt Siebs will be sacked after last years result and extension. I would have locked in Payten, but he seems to have turned it around somewhat. O’Brien is on the list for sure. Don’t think there are many others on the list tbh.
Imagine O'Brien gets sacked before Dylan Brown even gets there... And they're stuck with his stupid decision until 2036!

If you think our club has problems... There's always someone worse!
 
Imagine O'Brien gets sacked before Dylan Brown even gets there... And they're stuck with his stupid decision until 2036!

If you think our club has problems... There's always someone worse!
At Manly We do not focus on who is worse
Because if we do that we focus on failure
There is only One way In The Manly Way
and the Only Way Is Up
 
Sacking O’Brien or Seibold after round seven, especially when their teams reached the semi-finals last season, may not be justified.

Early-season struggles can stem from various factors, including injuries, fixture difficulties, or issues not directly related to coaching performance.

Prematurely dismissing the coach could disrupt team dynamics and morale, ultimately hindering performance in the long run. It may be more prudent to give the coach a chance to recalibrate and demonstrate their capabilities over a longer period.
 
Sacking O’Brien or Seibold after round seven, especially when their teams reached the semi-finals last season, may not be justified.
Early-season struggles can stem from various factors, including injuries, fixture difficulties, or issues not directly related to coaching performance.
Prematurely dismissing the coach could disrupt team dynamics and morale, ultimately hindering performance in the long run. It may be more prudent to give the coach a chance to recalibrate and demonstrate their capabilities over a longer period.
The thread head line is all about which coach will be sacked first
it does not specify which round
But time is running out for both of them
No one wants to waste time with Losers
This is why clubs pay these losers out to ease the losing pain
 
Sacking O’Brien or Seibold after round seven, especially when their teams reached the semi-finals last season, may not be justified.

Early-season struggles can stem from various factors, including injuries, fixture difficulties, or issues not directly related to coaching performance.

Prematurely dismissing the coach could disrupt team dynamics and morale, ultimately hindering performance in the long run. It may be more prudent to give the coach a chance to recalibrate and demonstrate their capabilities over a longer period.
I reckon he's got 8 weeks to get at least 10-12 points otherwise he needs to go.
 
Sacking O’Brien or Seibold after round seven, especially when their teams reached the semi-finals last season, may not be justified.

Early-season struggles can stem from various factors, including injuries, fixture difficulties, or issues not directly related to coaching performance.

Prematurely dismissing the coach could disrupt team dynamics and morale, ultimately hindering performance in the long run. It may be more prudent to give the coach a chance to recalibrate and demonstrate their capabilities over a longer period.
Yes, the worst thing is to sack a coach mid season. It rarely, if ever, has the desired effect. Often, the first 2-3 games will see a spike in enthusiasm but when the honeymoon period is over, clubs typically perform even worse. The last thing we need is any additional noise around the club at the moment. DCE brought enough attention to us already.

A sacking is best left to the end of the season and a fresh start with a new coach during pre season is ideal. Personally, I don’t see Seibs as needing the sack regardless.
 
Many disappointing teams this year. Sadly Manly are heading south with an arrow as well.

Canterbury and Canberra are arguably the two teams performing above expectations.

But O'Brien clearly the most under pressure.
 
Sacking O’Brien or Seibold after round seven, especially when their teams reached the semi-finals last season, may not be justified.

Early-season struggles can stem from various factors, including injuries, fixture difficulties, or issues not directly related to coaching performance.

Prematurely dismissing the coach could disrupt team dynamics and morale, ultimately hindering performance in the long run. It may be more prudent to give the coach a chance to recalibrate and demonstrate their capabilities over a longer period.
Pretty sure O’Brien has only missed the finals once in his Knights tenure.They always seem to start slowly then somehow pull their finger out to scrape into the 8.He’s an easy target for people to criticise but I’d take that record at Manly,not O’Brien himself though
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 6 6 0 0 98 14
2 Storm 6 4 0 2 70 10
3 Warriors 6 4 0 2 -18 10
4 Broncos 7 4 0 3 54 8
5 Raiders 6 4 0 2 36 8
6 Dragons 6 3 0 3 20 8
7 Rabbitohs 7 4 0 3 -36 8
8 Cowboys 6 3 0 3 -42 8
9 Tigers 6 3 0 3 28 6
10 Dolphins 7 3 0 4 28 6
11 Sharks 6 3 0 3 21 6
12 Sea Eagles 7 3 0 4 20 6
13 Titans 5 2 0 3 -26 6
14 Knights 5 2 0 3 -40 6
15 Panthers 7 2 0 5 -10 4
16 Roosters 7 2 0 5 -80 4
17 Eels 6 1 0 5 -123 2
Back
Top Bottom