Let's hope he doesn't pick up a neck strain now - that could mean a long stretch.DCE ????
Listen feathered friend ...
The Durable DCE has not had a sick day off since he had the Measles when he was a kid .
Let's hope he doesn't pick up a neck strain now - that could mean a long stretch.DCE ????
Listen feathered friend ...
The Durable DCE has not had a sick day off since he had the Measles when he was a kid .
Oh please, you said from pride gate onwards, but now you want to include Turbo and Saab and have Shuster at 5/8 etc etc etc.
As I said, we aren't going great but throwing in that period with a squad in turmoil and a busted team is not strengthening your point, it is devaluing it.
What are you talking about?Fair enough. Let's just pretend all the players that were injured don't exist and weren't part of the squad. Maybe they did rehab and train in Kuwait?
The squads has absolutely nominal changes.
But maybe you're right, and all the sports journalists, coaches and players who've stated our roster (top 25-30) has been relatively consistent are all wrong.
The ladder is tight as, Cowboys at second last are only 4 points of 8th. Why are we panicking at the half way point....get a grip all..We are currently in a dog fight for bottom 4.
IF Turbo or DCE pick up a(nother) major injury we will fight it out for the spoon.
Top 8 is a pipedream and would require all of players fit and firing for the remainder of the season.
Half his luck!Playing in the south of France.
What are you talking about?
All I stated was including the last 6 games of last year (post pride gate) whilst discussing this years team is creating a false equivalence as the team, coaching staff and situation FROM THE LAST 6 ROUNDS OF LAST YEAR to now are different.
Not saying better now
Not saying worse now
Not saying our roster is strong
Not saying our roster it week.
Simply stating the LAST 6 ROUNDS of last year are not indicative of anything in this season.
Not trying to polish anything.And I disagree. You're implying players 18-30 (in last year's case 31-32 with dispensation) won't be relied upon again in the event of torrid injury or heaven forbid another player revolt.
My comment is the top 30 for us is relatively unchanged, particularly comparatively speaking versus the rest of the league (most improved), so I sure as bloody CAN talk about the clubs form since jersey gate, and frankly, it's been insipid.
For mine, it's a mixture of ****house recruitment, terrible culture, run of injuries, and terribly slow, overweight and unfit players, who refuse to all pull in the same direction.
Until we acquire some actual character (think Kennedy, Kite, Lyon & others) nothing will change. I've said it before, we could have Bennett / Bellamy joint head coaches with Cleary running the water, and they still couldn't motivate these lumps.
Nothing has changed since that point last season. 5 wins Disco. FIVE. In 19 !! 23% odd win rate over 20 odd games dude. Horrible. Can't honestly believe you're even trying to polish that one.
Not trying to polish anything.
Simply saying a that the team over that 6 game stretch including Foran, Taupau, Walker, Davey, Smalley, Pico, De Luis, Roumanos. Schuster as a bench forward, Bully as an edge with Des, Monas and Randall coaching is not indicative of anything atm.
Pretty straight forward.
But hey, I've not the energy or inclination to keep this going. We disagree.
A lot of talk about how the bye points skews the ladder but it really doesnt too much.I think the 2 points given for the bye are there to fool the mug punters into an illusion of what the ladder doesn't really represent. I think this suits sports betting companies to a tee.
Only a small difference but it is a more accurate reflection of how teams are going. W/L % is basically the same thing but makes for easier comparison of teams.A lot of talk about how the bye points skews the ladder but it really doesnt too much.
Sure you get 2 extra points, but on the flipside if you don't get 2 points you are disadvantaged by have had less opportunities to gain points.....basically never way is perfect but it doesnt really effect much.
To illustrate, the best way to get an accurate ladder is to remove the bye points and then divide competition points by games played.
So for example, the Panthers are on 18 points but 4 of that is from byes. So they have 14 points from 11 games at 1.27 competition points per game played.
So with that in mind lets look at a points per game ladder compared to there current position (attached for reference)
1.Broncos 1.38ppg (3rd)
2.Panthers 1.27 (1st)
3.Sharks 1.27 (2nd)
4.Storm 1.27 (4th)
5.Rabbitohs 1.23 (5th)
6.Dolphins 1.17 (6th)
7.Raiders 1.17 (7th)
8.Warriors 1 (8th)
9.Manly 0.92 (11th)
10.Knights 0.92 (12th)
11.Parra 0.92 (13th)
12.Titans 0.91 (9th)
13.Roosters 0.91 (10th)
14. Bulldogs 0.83 (14th)
15.Cowboys 0.77 (16th)
16.Tigers 0.55 (15th)
17.Dragons 0.5 (17th)
So Broncos go from equal first to outright.
Titans and Roosters drop a few spots but you are talking .1 difference and then Tigers drop a spot.
Not a huge difference.
Batter batter batterA lot of talk about how the bye points skews the ladder but it really doesnt too much.
Sure you get 2 extra points, but on the flipside if you don't get 2 points you are disadvantaged by have had less opportunities to gain points.....basically never way is perfect but it doesnt really effect much.
To illustrate, the best way to get an accurate ladder is to remove the bye points and then divide competition points by games played.
So for example, the Panthers are on 18 points but 4 of that is from byes. So they have 14 points from 11 games at 1.27 competition points per game played.
So with that in mind lets look at a points per game ladder compared to there current position (attached for reference)
1.Broncos 1.38ppg (3rd)
2.Panthers 1.27 (1st)
3.Sharks 1.27 (2nd)
4.Storm 1.27 (4th)
5.Rabbitohs 1.23 (5th)
6.Dolphins 1.17 (6th)
7.Raiders 1.17 (7th)
8.Warriors 1 (8th)
9.Manly 0.92 (11th)
10.Knights 0.92 (12th)
11.Parra 0.92 (13th)
12.Titans 0.91 (9th)
13.Roosters 0.91 (10th)
14. Bulldogs 0.83 (14th)
15.Cowboys 0.77 (16th)
16.Tigers 0.55 (15th)
17.Dragons 0.5 (17th)
So Broncos go from equal first to outright.
Titans and Roosters drop a few spots but you are talking .1 difference and then Tigers drop a spot.
Not a huge difference.
Yes very hard to argue with this. It’s not because we are not good enough to win five or more games. We could be so good. We just struggle with momentum. We always have so many injuries or players out of form or we just can’t seem to gel or we get crazy ref decisions like we had against souths and last week.Good summation mate. Tough / harsh, but honestly fair and realistic.
As the old saying goes “You can’t polish a turd”And I disagree. You're implying players 18-30 (in last year's case 31-32 with dispensation) won't be relied upon again in the event of torrid injury or heaven forbid another player revolt.
My comment is the top 30 for us is relatively unchanged, particularly comparatively speaking versus the rest of the league (most improved), so I sure as bloody CAN talk about the clubs form since jersey gate, and frankly, it's been insipid.
For mine, it's a mixture of ****house recruitment, terrible culture, run of injuries, and terribly slow, overweight and unfit players, who refuse to all pull in the same direction.
Until we acquire some actual character (think Kennedy, Kite, Lyon & others) nothing will change. I've said it before, we could have Bennett / Bellamy joint head coaches with Cleary running the water, and they still couldn't motivate these lumps.
Nothing has changed since that point last season. 5 wins Disco. FIVE. In 19 !! 23% odd win rate over 20 odd games dude. Horrible. Can't honestly believe you're even trying to polish that one.
You can say that again. lolAs the old saying goes “You can’t polish a turd”
Not quite true. Put it in the fridge and slap a coat of lacquer on it, and you're good to go. And at this stage I'd probably settle for a coat of lacquer for this team…As the old saying goes “You can’t polish a turd”
I'm not sure if I'm going to agree or disagree with you yet mate.Different team? Let's see, full strength how many different players we have from last season?
1. Turbo (same)
2. Saab (same)
3. Koula (same)
4. Parker (same)
5. Garrick (same)
6. Schuster (same)
7. DCE (same)
8. Jake (same)
9. Croker (same)
10. Paseka (same)
11. Olakau'atu (same)
12. Tuilagi (NEW)
13. Aloiai (same)
14. Lawton (same)
15. Keppie (same)
16. Burbo (same)
17. Bullemor (same)
I mean, one IS different - I guess. I spoke about attitude, culture and the like. Given the nominal turnover here, particularly with key players, I don't see much change.
18. Sipley (same)
19. Weekes (same)
20. Tuipulotu (same)
21. Vaega (same)
22. Harper (same)
23. Boyle (same)
24. Fainu (same)
25. GCKT (same)
26. Forget who.
27. Arthur (New) - been here 1 game
28. Johns (New)
29. Woods (New) - but has been in BT
30. Condon (New) - but has been in BT
Given the above, how can you suggest the team or anything is different?.It's the same crap. Players who look like they are already on the beach. Complete lack of effort. I'd actually suggest with the small amount of player turnover, quality wise we've regressed.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 19 | 5 | 243 | 44 | |
24 | 17 | 7 | 186 | 40 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 275 | 38 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 222 | 38 | |
24 | 15 | 9 | 89 | 36 | |
24 | 14 | 10 | 96 | 34 | |
24 | 13 | 10 | 113 | 33 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -40 | 30 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -127 | 30 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 28 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -126 | 28 | |
24 | 10 | 14 | -70 | 26 | |
24 | 9 | 14 | -62 | 25 | |
24 | 8 | 16 | -168 | 22 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -155 | 20 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -188 | 20 | |
24 | 6 | 18 | -287 | 18 |