where did you hear this whisper ?Brookie said:anyone heard a whisper about grant coming to manly?
replacement for kite...
where did you hear this whisper ?Brookie said:anyone heard a whisper about grant coming to manly?
replacement for kite...
Brookie said:anyone heard a whisper about grant coming to manly?
replacement for kite...
BOZO said:where did you hear this whisper ?Brookie said:anyone heard a whisper about grant coming to manly?
replacement for kite...
Stevo said:They have Grant coming off the bench at Penrith so it's possible he's not happy out there.
flying sea eagle said:RLW Mole says no to Tim grant rumour
bones said:SeaEagleRock8 said:Players will often accept less money to play with a club that is consistently successful. Ditto for Storm, and previously the Broncos. For a club rebuilding, the first couple of marquee signings will always cost a motza.bones said:Bearfax said:Most of them are past internationals Bones well after their international used by date. How many present internationals are in the Manly team. Foran and maybe sometimes Watmough and Glen Stewart. That's it. Try talking about present representatives and you get a better feel for who has the advantage. Matai, Brett Stewart, Lyon, Williams have not played test football in years. Try looking at Souths, Canterbury, Melbourne, North Queensland for a load of current representative players
Past or current, it doesn't matter, they'd all still be on good money. If I had to pick one team which I thought would be the most difficult to work out how they all fit in under the cap, Manly would be that team. I'm not suggesting we are over, more that we have the best roster in the NRL IMO and the club has done a great job to keep as many of the GF winning side together as it has.
Yep I agree. Matai being the perfect example of this. The storm have the 'big three' who would all be on big money but there would be a big jump down to the next tier. The rest of their team would not be on hugemoney. Whereas Manly have a stronger roster right across the team.
Bearfax said:I think you will find canterbury and Souths have more internationals playing for them and rep players in general than Manly. Did an audit late last year and Manly has since lost several rep players.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 106 | 18 |
2 | Warriors | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
3 | Storm | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 140 | 14 |
4 | Raiders | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 14 |
5 | Sharks | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 65 | 12 |
6 | Cowboys | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -14 | 11 |
7 | Broncos | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 46 | 10 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 10 |
10 | Tigers | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -44 | 10 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -62 | 10 |
12 | Dolphins | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
13 | Dragons | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -15 | 8 |
14 | Knights | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -52 | 8 |
15 | Titans | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -84 | 8 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
17 | Eels | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -121 | 6 |