1st November player scramble

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well , it’s hardly been a free for all ( to date ) has it , but I’m thinking most of the clubs staff would be on annual leave at present so maybe #nextweek
I think the media are the only ones that hyped up November 1.Pre season has only just started for some clubs so staff and players are only just working their way back into a plan for the season ahead.Given the NRL has no time limit to make signings,clubs aren’t going to rush into signings just to appease the media’s needs to have a story to write
 
It depends on if it’s 1004kg of muscle or fat… which is heavier again??

(Might be showing my age with this comment and the more recent members of the forum may not understand it…)
more concerned on how he would fit on the interchange bench without breaking it
 
It depends on if it’s 1004kg of muscle or fat… which is heavier again??

(Might be showing my age with this comment and the more recent members of the forum may not understand it…)
Wicked you are.
 
The club really to sign an enforcer somebody like Kikau (defence and hit up). Leaking way too many points playing versus the top four side & the Knights.
 

If clubs sack unvaccinated players, should their wages be exempt from cap?​

By Adam Pengilly

November 7, 2021 — 7.45pm
NRL clubs want clarity on whether they will have to absorb the wages of unvaccinated players in their salary cap should they decide to terminate the contracts of those who refuse to take the jab.

A crucial meeting of six NRL club bosses and the Rugby League Players Association will take place on Monday as the code’s vaccination stance reaches a crossroads, with a large cohort of NRL players from clubs which didn’t make the finals due to return to pre-season training this week.
While several clubs have openly discussed the possibility of sacking players who decline to be vaccinated, the issue of whether a player’s wages should still be counted in the salary cap before their contract is torn up has become a topic of hot debate.
The NRL’s new contracting period began on November 1, meaning those players who are yet to be inoculated against COVID-19 - and unable to fulfil all club duties during pre-season - have started being paid for the 2022 period.

While the RLPA is lobbying for a unified approach in how unvaccinated players are handled and are urging clubs not to rush into any decisions with those who have not had the jab, it will test the patience of employers to keep paying players who can’t join their teammates for pre-season training.
For example, if a club decides to terminate the contract of an unvaccinated player in February, should the wages they might have already been paid for three months be counted inside the salary cap?
The Storm are seeking guidance on the case of New Zealand international Nelson Asofa-Solomona, who has declined to be vaccinated thus far and posted another anti-vax message on his social media channel last week.

Asofa-Solomona is one of the highest earners at the Storm, who fall under Victorian government regulations which dictate professional athletes are authorised workers and must be vaccinated to train or play in the state.
The NRL has refused to mandate vaccinations for its playing group, unlike the AFL which declared any men’s or women’s player or football department member had to have received two COVID-19 jabs to participate in its competition.
It has essentially left NRL clubs to figure out themselves how to treat players who are yet to be vaccinated, or have no plans doing so.
NSW public health orders prevent unvaccinated players joining the rest of the squad for clubs which train in stadium facilities, including the Dragons, Bulldogs and Sharks.
According to sources familiar with the situation, most clubs still have at least one player who has shown vaccine hesitancy or is refusing to be jabbed for a variety of reasons, whether it be a pro-choice stance or personal issues relating to their own medical history or that of a family member.

The NRL is confident it will reach 95 per cent of players being fully vaccinated before the start of the 2022 season in March. The Knights are the first club to have its entire top squad fully vaccinated.
 

If clubs sack unvaccinated players, should their wages be exempt from cap?​

By Adam Pengilly

November 7, 2021 — 7.45pm
NRL clubs want clarity on whether they will have to absorb the wages of unvaccinated players in their salary cap should they decide to terminate the contracts of those who refuse to take the jab.

A crucial meeting of six NRL club bosses and the Rugby League Players Association will take place on Monday as the code’s vaccination stance reaches a crossroads, with a large cohort of NRL players from clubs which didn’t make the finals due to return to pre-season training this week.
While several clubs have openly discussed the possibility of sacking players who decline to be vaccinated, the issue of whether a player’s wages should still be counted in the salary cap before their contract is torn up has become a topic of hot debate.
The NRL’s new contracting period began on November 1, meaning those players who are yet to be inoculated against COVID-19 - and unable to fulfil all club duties during pre-season - have started being paid for the 2022 period.

While the RLPA is lobbying for a unified approach in how unvaccinated players are handled and are urging clubs not to rush into any decisions with those who have not had the jab, it will test the patience of employers to keep paying players who can’t join their teammates for pre-season training.
For example, if a club decides to terminate the contract of an unvaccinated player in February, should the wages they might have already been paid for three months be counted inside the salary cap?
The Storm are seeking guidance on the case of New Zealand international Nelson Asofa-Solomona, who has declined to be vaccinated thus far and posted another anti-vax message on his social media channel last week.

Asofa-Solomona is one of the highest earners at the Storm, who fall under Victorian government regulations which dictate professional athletes are authorised workers and must be vaccinated to train or play in the state.
The NRL has refused to mandate vaccinations for its playing group, unlike the AFL which declared any men’s or women’s player or football department member had to have received two COVID-19 jabs to participate in its competition.
It has essentially left NRL clubs to figure out themselves how to treat players who are yet to be vaccinated, or have no plans doing so.
NSW public health orders prevent unvaccinated players joining the rest of the squad for clubs which train in stadium facilities, including the Dragons, Bulldogs and Sharks.
According to sources familiar with the situation, most clubs still have at least one player who has shown vaccine hesitancy or is refusing to be jabbed for a variety of reasons, whether it be a pro-choice stance or personal issues relating to their own medical history or that of a family member.

The NRL is confident it will reach 95 per cent of players being fully vaccinated before the start of the 2022 season in March. The Knights are the first club to have its entire top squad fully vaccinated.
It’s a good point I must say
 
Ahh ****.

So if Walker stays our top 30s done. Well 1 spot left, which we would be crazy not to leave open till June 30.

I'm a bit surprised both Tui and Sione take top 30 spots.

Probably suggests backrower like Burbo, Davey Lawton or just may be Shoe may be centre options.

Now only 1 development spot left, which U would think is where the 18 year old Newcastle kids is being offered.

I think we might have a very quiet off season.
 
And the Brandon Smith circus continues with the Cheese visiting both the Dolphins and the Titans and now off to the Knights.

But we all know he’ll probably stay at the Drizzle for half the money !!

Lol
 
And the Brandon Smith circus continues with the Cheese visiting both the Dolphins and the Titans and now off to the Knights.

But we all know he’ll probably stay at the Drizzle for half the money !!

Lol
Nah! he's moving on to greener pastures Mark, or should I say money pastures. He did look pretty happy with his visit to Redcliffe though. The Tits could be a smokie though, having plastic bags with white substances in it, this smacks of a great Gold Coast lifestyle..
 
And the Brandon Smith circus continues with the Cheese visiting both the Dolphins and the Titans and now off to the Knights.

But we all know he’ll probably stay at the Drizzle for half the money !!

Lol
Lol maybe Mark, but not all of us know he'll probably stay there...If you were in Smith's shoes would you...I doubt it.

For me it would be a case of get it while I can. I think he'll go to the highest bidder!
 
Lol maybe Mark, but not all of us know he'll probably stay there...If you were in Smith's shoes would you...I doubt it.

For me it would be a case of get it while I can. I think he'll go to the highest bidder!
Yeah if the $$$ are much bigger he may as well
 
Lol maybe Mark, but not all of us know he'll probably stay there...If you were in Smith's shoes would you...I doubt it.

For me it would be a case of get it while I can. I think he'll go to the highest bidder!
Going to the Knights is very doable for Smith, got a bit of history with angry face O'brien from his time at Melb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Team P W L PD Pts
7 6 1 99 14
7 6 1 54 14
7 5 2 36 12
8 5 2 39 11
8 5 3 64 10
7 4 3 49 10
8 4 4 73 8
7 3 4 17 8
8 4 4 -14 8
8 4 4 -16 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
8 3 5 -25 6
7 2 5 -55 6
8 3 5 -55 6
7 1 6 -87 4
7 1 6 -136 4
Back
Top Bottom