Williamson

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Canteen Worker, Mar 7, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    Very mixed opinions about Luke Williamson and his value to the team.


    Some rate him and others don't.

    Me - I think he is vital - a great asset to the team defensively when the defence is getting tired. No mistakes, cleans up and runs hard. Never lets us down, versatile and can kick goals too if needed.

    Indispensible in my view!!!
     
  2. fLIP

    By:fLIPMar 7, 2006
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,239
    Likes Received:
    520
    Likes Given:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,160 /51
    He's our hard man. He'll make the tackle that fires everyone up. Its just not blatantly obvious.
     
  3. Nutzcraw

    By:NutzcrawMar 7, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    12
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    We need him for sure...

    I am a fan!
     
  4. Ryan

    By:RyanMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,081
    Likes Received:
    4,067
    Likes Given:
    701
    Ratings:
    +11,278 /494
    He's not as effective in attack as Cuthbertson.
    He's not as effective in defence than Watmough, Menzies & BK.
    He's not as skillfull as Witt, Burns, Monaghan and Orford.
    He's not as fast as Alberts, Matai and Bell.

    Yup...I don't see his value in any position.

    A "working" player that hasn't got impact has no place in the game today.

    That's why we released (upon his request) Heckenberg without an issue in my opinion.

    Would Williamson get a run, in The Roosters, Broncos, Parra, Dragons sides???

    That should answer what you are asking...and I leave it up to your honest interpretation on whether you think he'd make their sides.
     
  5. fLIP

    By:fLIPMar 7, 2006
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,239
    Likes Received:
    520
    Likes Given:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,160 /51
    A player like that might have got a run for the bears once upon a time.
     
  6. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    I strongly disagree with Ryan. Willo is a great utility man who is a workhorse. He is very underrated in my view.
     
  7. Nutzcraw

    By:NutzcrawMar 7, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    12
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    I personally can't speak highly enough of him.. he is the type of player every team needs...

    When the opposition is 10 metres out from our line and they run towards him you know there isn't going to be a try that tackle!!

    Very handy player... i wouldn't have him out of my team..

    It's like phil gould says about menzies making last years origin team.. he may not be the flash up and coming bloke with every skill in the book.. but as a coach you are confident you can get the win with him in ya team..

    I think dessie thinks the same about willo and i do also!
     
  8. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerMar 7, 2006
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    I agree with CW & Nutzcraw. Willo is today's OJ Cunningham. A player who is not a specialist but still retains the ability to slot in almost everywhere and who's work rate is equal to almost the best. Maybe the game has changed as Ryan says but I am not yet convinced and still doubt it. It is amazing when you don't have players like Willo how the gaps suddenly appear in defence when the others are gasping for air.
     
  9. robbiea

    By:robbieaMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member
    Super Coach Member 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    627
    Likes Given:
    882
    Ratings:
    +3,141 /100
    Willo needs to be there at the moment anyway.He gives 100% when he comes on & will tackle all day.As Ryan says ,he has no specialty position ,that may be,but you can throw him in anywhere & he will do the grind.I think he is vital for the team at the moment as not all spots have been secured & there is going to be a bit of changing the 1st 5 rounds. A few of the p-leaguers will be going hard for a spot in 1st,s ,& i dont think Willo is going to lie down & let them take it from him...
     
  10. Barks

    By:BarksMar 7, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Good points Ryan, but until Cuthbertson has proved himself in NRL - I'll stick with Willow.
    BK and watmough are more effective with a rest period - bring on Willow
    For his role, he doesn't need to be as skillful or fast like the guys mentioned.

    Hopefully Cuthbo does become the "impact" player in the future, because Willow is a fair back up replacement at best.
     
  11. Chip and Chase

    By:Chip and ChaseMar 7, 2006
    True Supporter
    Staff Member Administrator Premium Member Super Coach Member 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2004
    Messages:
    15,384
    Likes Received:
    3,870
    Likes Given:
    1,364
    Ratings:
    +10,734 /119
    Willo's OK, most teams have one of his ilk in their ranks. He's a workhorse and can cover a few possies which gives the bench a bit of flexibility. If he is used correctly than he is an asset.

    He might not win us too many games, but he won't lose us any either.
     
  12. KaZa

    By:KaZaMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,155
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +402 /24
    i remember a game last year when we were struggling in defence.. and he came on and made some good tackles and a few decent hits. He lifted the defensive intensity. I think hes massively underated..
     
  13. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Williamson should be in the number 6.

    He's far better "value" to our side than Monaghan - especially when size of contract is taken into consideration.
     
  14. Garts

    By:GartsMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +935 /25
    Disagree with him playing No 6, it didnt work playing a forward there last year and it wont work this season.

    Orford needs someone else to take some of the attacking pressure from him. Not sure if that is Monas but we shall see soon enough, I will reserve judgement at the moment.
     
  15. Ryan

    By:RyanMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,081
    Likes Received:
    4,067
    Likes Given:
    701
    Ratings:
    +11,278 /494
    I'm happy with Burns / Witt....the value for money would be better too.
     
  16. Guest

    By:GuestMar 7, 2006
    Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Good points Ryan, but until Cuthbertson has proved himself in NRL - I'll stick with Willow.
    BK and watmough are more effective with a rest period - bring on Willow
    For his role, he doesn't need to be as skillful or fast like the guys mentioned.

    Hopefully Cuthbo does become the "impact" player in the future, because Willow is a fair back up replacement at best.

    [/quote]

    Its a bit hard for Cuthbo to prove himself in the NRL if dessie picks him on the bench for PL. If we don't give some of the younger talented players a go we will lose them next year to other teams.
     
  17. SilentBob

    By:SilentBobMar 7, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    3
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    He carries a higher defence workload than most, someone would need to cover that if he isn't there, something they struggled with last time he was out for an extended time.


    He is a utility player, compare him to the other utility players to get a fair comparison.
    As a utility player his value is much greater than some of the specialist players. The fact that you can compare him to 11 players in 4-5 different positions proves the important utility value he brings.
    Tell this to Fitzgibbon, Flannery, McGuire, Maitua etc
    Speculation.
    Would Stewart? Would Leuluai? Manly is the side you have to worry about.
     
  18. Nutzcraw

    By:NutzcrawMar 8, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    12
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    yeah, i was gonna say before that ryan has finished his own argument by the amount of players he compared willo against!!
     
  19. Cameron

    By:CameronMar 8, 2006
    Lewis Brown 4 life
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    6,780
    Likes Received:
    648
    Likes Given:
    467
    Ratings:
    +2,187 /176
    i agree with CW hes an awesome defender, not a flashy player and doesnt have the attacking skills of our back row but thats why hes a bench man he doesnt need to have the attacking skills when we have arguably the best back 3 in the league. Also the fact he can cover, centre, 5/8, lock, second row and hooker makes him great value on the bench.
     
  20. byso

    By:bysoMar 8, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,612
    Likes Received:
    87
    Likes Given:
    60
    Ratings:
    +95 /0
    Oh my, some do have rose coloured glasses for certain players which is unjustified.

    Williamson has had bad games and he can be a turnstile.

    But I agree that "generally" he's a solid player. But rarely will he win you a game. There's no way he's a better player than Monas. Not creatively or defensively.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top