Masked Eagle
Bencher
The article above mentions gamma oryzanol as a legal substance, but is it on the WADA banned list?
edit - it was above when I typed in my post! 😉
edit - it was above when I typed in my post! 😉
Masked Eagle said:The article above mentions gamma oryzanol as a legal substance, but is it on the WADA banned list?
edit - it was above when I typed in my post! 😉
Hamster Huey said:Already 24hrs later the news on the police matter is an afterthought in the days reporting across the country at large; the latest sports related 'controversy' has already overtaken it with the 'Waterhouse' debate taking up airtime.
Put simply, while the police matter is a concern in general, it's not forefront in the mind of Joe Public and thus the (social) media runs quiet on it. Nobody is looking for a public exclusive to out a player, official and/or club.
Rex said:Hamster Huey said:Already 24hrs later the news on the police matter is an afterthought in the days reporting across the country at large; the latest sports related 'controversy' has already overtaken it with the 'Waterhouse' debate taking up airtime.
Put simply, while the police matter is a concern in general, it's not forefront in the mind of Joe Public and thus the (social) media runs quiet on it. Nobody is looking for a public exclusive to out a player, official and/or club.
That there is the crux of the difference xHamster.
It is only massive overreactions from the footy fans - from people like you Hamster - that gives this story any life. Stop speculating and the story dies on its arse.
If there is such a thing as defamation of the innocent here, the Vic Police story "defames" 30 times more innocent police than the ASADA story "defames" NRL players.
It is only the emotional reactivity of league fans that gives this story any legs. You are puppets of the likes of Rothfield every time you react.
The moral: stop wetting your pants (you and others like you) - simply wait for the outcome - and the story will die on its arse. Exactly what I've been telling you all along.
Rex said:That there is the crux of the difference xHamster.
Rex said:Those still wetting their pants over trivialities won't see the significance of fundamental changes like these. Well done the NRL (& ASADA).
They can't rip up the agreement unfortunately, if they did rugby league would lose govt funding and Australia wouldn't be able to compete in RL internationals or world cupBrissie Kid said:Why doesn't the ARLC get some balls and rip up their agreement to follow ASADA & WADA?
The damage that is being done to the game is far worse than the pain and damage of this witch hunt fishing expedition of an investigation.
We now know no club systematically doped and no team won a premiership doped.
And what is 'doped' in this current crisis anyway?
So far it seems to be the taking of recovery aiding supplements that aren't named as banned but some think might now fall under the banned test and others don't think the supplements qualify as banned at all. On a scale of 1 to 10 of "drug cheating" that is nearer 0 or 1 not a 10.
League is a team sport not individual athletes like swimming or cycling.
For all this speculation the NRL players collectively are being branded drug cheats, a code in crisis being ripped apart and the code's image is being trashed.
Just rip the ASADA agreement up and tell them to get out of rugby league. Then replace it with our own ARLC testing scheme like the NFL do.
RL Gronk said:They can't rip up the agreement unfortunately, if they did rugby league would lose govt funding and Australia wouldn't be able to compete in RL internationals or world cupBrissie Kid said:Why doesn't the ARLC get some balls and rip up their agreement to follow ASADA & WADA?
The damage that is being done to the game is far worse than the pain and damage of this witch hunt fishing expedition of an investigation.
We now know no club systematically doped and no team won a premiership doped.
And what is 'doped' in this current crisis anyway?
So far it seems to be the taking of recovery aiding supplements that aren't named as banned but some think might now fall under the banned test and others don't think the supplements qualify as banned at all. On a scale of 1 to 10 of "drug cheating" that is nearer 0 or 1 not a 10.
League is a team sport not individual athletes like swimming or cycling.
For all this speculation the NRL players collectively are being branded drug cheats, a code in crisis being ripped apart and the code's image is being trashed.
Just rip the ASADA agreement up and tell them to get out of rugby league. Then replace it with our own ARLC testing scheme like the NFL do.
Hamster Huey said:I don't think the Fed Govt funding is an issue in light of the recent TV deal, but the inability to play at an International level is the stopper.
The IRLF is a signed up federation with WADA.
Hamster Huey said:Rex said:Those still wetting their pants over trivialities won't see the significance of fundamental changes like these. Well done the NRL (& ASADA).
?
Who anywhere has indicated that the likes of 'passports' and other risk mitigation strategies wouldn't be a great development?
Surely you're not trying to demonise others opinions on separate matters, with vague or misleading associations, are you?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |