Jake his doing the role he has been given - and doing it bloody well...The real problem with Jake is that he gets absolutely no help from anyone other than Croker. He makes EVERY middle tackle, EVERY game. No wonder he's buggered when we get the ball (which we usually drop within three plays anyway…)
As for his pay packet, it's not his fault he gets paid what he's paid. Same goes for DCE and every other NRL player on an "inflated" contract. You only get what someone is willing to pay you. So blame the idiots in charge, not the players.
Nice trollThere is an unspoken truth among the vast majority of Manly fans. Can we all agree that Jake T is not performing to his lofty pay packet?
Its all well and good to have defensive specialists in your team....but they usually command a much lower pay packet than Jake.
7 runs for 47m.....not the first time he has not clocked good meterage this season or many seasons before that. But if his name was oh....Marty Taupau....they would be calling for his head. I pity the bloke who will eventually need to tell Jake T to take a paycut. Tommy T is fast becoming less of a reason to sacrifice a spot for his brother.
Well said.The real problem with Jake is that he gets absolutely no help from anyone other than Croker. He makes EVERY middle tackle, EVERY game. No wonder he's buggered when we get the ball (which we usually drop within three plays anyway…)
As for his pay packet, it's not his fault he gets paid what he's paid. Same goes for DCE and every other NRL player on an "inflated" contract. You only get what someone is willing to pay you. So blame the idiots in charge, not the players.
HERE ARE THE STATS!!!!! 53m a game!LOL. Are you guys really that easily trolled ? New member, signed up at 11.30pm and his first post is a thread on one of our most consistent and passionate players being overrated. He got some bites though. Didn't this give it away ??
Don't dare knock the Great Tolman and compare his attacking prowess to Jake T
Time for a spell.
Disagree mate….lying all over players, gave away his usual 6 again & lucky not to be binned! Sorry mate he was one of our worst last night! Definitely not worth the money he’s being paid. Not worth any more than 500k. I’d like to see him get dropped until he learns to stop putting players around him under constant pressure with his lying all over players.He was our best player tonight. Did you see how much tackling he did, and how he continually chased?
It would have been 60-nil without him and Froggy.
NO!!!!!! Overpaid in my opinion compared to other Lock forwards.Is he worth marquee money? Yes or no?
The club are having to over pay Jake so that Trbo stays & is happy. People take the pi$$ out of DCE & Marty being overpaid yet think the sun shines out of the Trbojevics….why? If DCE & Marty are overpaid then the former two are definitely!!!Well said.
Always laugh when the comments come about blaming a player for being overpaid. Yes there are instances where players get a contract and slack off. But that's not Jake. Jake tries his guts out each week.
Yeah his value right now is more like 600k rather than 900k.
But Blame the club for offering him the contract, blame Des's use of Jake, blame the change in the games rules.
You actually just hit the Nail right on the head comparing him to Froggy.He was our best player tonight. Did you see how much tackling he did, and how he continually chased?
It would have been 60-nil without him and Froggy.
Add Radley to that list who’s on way less than Jake. I know who I’d rather have as our lock. The way Jake is playing he’d struggle to get into any of the top 8 teams. I’m tired of hearing how many tackles he makes. There are other locks do the same amount of tackling & show so much more in offence!Josh King at Melbourne can do similar things to Jake now days and he’d be on about a 5th of the wage.
Jakes passes hit the target.You actually just hit the Nail right on the head comparing him to Froggy.
Jake and Froggy are identical players ATM.
Both all heart, ran their heart out last night. Tackled everything that moved in the middle.
The both have just only flaw which is speed. Jake just too slow with everything he does. Pass. Run. Find his stomach. Win the wrestle. Get a pin on arms carrying the ball. Get off player.
The more he trys. The more penaltys he gives.
Just think Froggy does the same defensive job yet compare their price.
Is it though? For 80 min game. Most forwards go over 100 playing half the minutes. Watmough use to average 150-200. He really needs to up his game. I wouldn't re sign him after his deal ends. We left a more talented brother in Gifty go. Maybe Jake's gone stale.His metres this year:
Game 1 - 94 metres
Game 2 - 75 metres
Game 3 - 92 metres
Game 4 - 109 metres
Game 5 - 62 metres
Game 6 - 70 metres
Game 7 - 65 metres
Game 8 - 104 metres
Game 9 - 80 metres
Game 10 - 58 metres
Average: 80 metres per game (so not that bad actually).
He does get hit in the head from time to time.Jake is not stupid
Is it though? For 80 min game. Most forwards go over 100 playing half the minutes. Watmough use to average 150-200. He really needs to up his game. I wouldn't re sign him after his deal ends. We left a more talented brother in Gifty go. Maybe Jake's gone stale.
Regarding his defence
He Makes 50 tackles per games
Gives away 12ish (2 set restarts) per game
So really
900k for 38 tackles and 80 metres on average
Not to mention the cost to the team physically and psychologically after they have to clean up
I like Jake.. but he has no speed or power. He's just on too much money in our cap. Unfortunately I think you could find similar players for alot less $$. De Luis for example... But he's a great bloke....
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |