We have 5 of the top 50 players in the game in my book. Signing young players with potential on huge coin doesn’t go well with that when you just need to fill out the roster.
Having 5 in the top 50 is the point! It means that unless you foster your good juniors you surround them with hacks like we do.
Who are these young talented types you speak of to replace him and the likes of Shuster.
Other than Suli who was an opportunistic punt and Metcalfe who couldnt get a run if we lost the entire team in a plane crash we haven’t signed anyone in that mould for years and show no indication of doing so.
Having five of the best players in the game and a misbalanced top heavy roster means your ONLY option is your youth. If we play with the three quarter line we dish up this year we are nothing more than nuisance value for a long time . and **** me they are horrible to watch compared to the good sides.
And the other obvious point is if these mythical players we are going to replace him with are any good they will come at a cost as well.
The other joke in all this is that to loan him thry must think Parker Elliot Tafua and Garrick are better than the Warriors outside backs. Ha ha ha ha
Food for thought. Who was the last top player, young or experienced, Des attracted to us or the Dogs. He let Cook go and the Dogs roster looked like Blacktown when they sacked him The only one was Foran getting massive overs to play five games a year. The dogs outside backs ended up looking like ....,you guessed it...OUR current backline.
My conclusion is that we must be satisfied that the current roster minus the good kids will win a comp if Hoppa has gone without a fight ( which I seriously doubt we could be that stupid).And that my friends would be more than a worry.
I’ve been a huge Des fan over the years but just have no idea where we are heading now. The game has change. Seems we haven’t.